Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Ms. Hillman is apparently ignorant of the fact that the majority of the gun crimes committed in Chicago are by criminals who carry concealed weapons illegally. Overturning the gun ban isn't going to change their actions. They'll still rob and murder. A gun ban has consequences for law-abiding citizens, not criminals.
1 posted on 03/05/2010 12:32:37 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: BuckeyeTexan

Obviously, this loon isn’t interested in the Bill of Rights. What a ditz.


2 posted on 03/05/2010 12:35:12 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (If you liked 2009, you're going to LOVE 2010!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
"... The amendment talks about a well-regulated militia and thus, it would seem that the right to bear arms is directly related to a militia."

Carol, you ignorant slut. Read the 'DC vs. Heller' decision.

3 posted on 03/05/2010 12:35:37 PM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Hey Carol, what do you think the words, “the right of the people . . . “ refers to? Perhaps you should spend some time reading the Federalist Papers instead of trying to reinterpret the meaning of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. What an fn moron.


4 posted on 03/05/2010 12:36:18 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
I suspect crime rates after the ban is lifted will prove me right!

It would be the first time ever that a liberalized gun law resulted in more crime. DC crime is down since the Heller decision.

5 posted on 03/05/2010 12:36:57 PM PST by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Like all ignorant Liberals, Ms. Hillman thinks that her feelings about feeling safer should trump the rights of those who want to protect themselves rather than hoping that the police will come to their rescue. Again, we hear the idiotic and willfully ignorant idea that a militia is an organized function of the government rather than being made up of able bodied citizens, originally male but now not necessarily so.


7 posted on 03/05/2010 12:37:44 PM PST by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
" . . . but gun rights supporters cannot prove that the right to bear arms extends to people who are not in the military!"

Yes, Carol, the United States in 1776 had a huge standing army that was positioned to protect the people from it's own government./sarc Stupid is as stupid does (or says).

8 posted on 03/05/2010 12:38:47 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
If gun control is so good why do the cities that force it have higher murder rates than deaths in recent wars?
9 posted on 03/05/2010 12:39:20 PM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

When liberals expose their ignorance, it’s never a pretty sight.


10 posted on 03/05/2010 12:39:31 PM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Obviously she ignored the comma then the rest of the amendment where it mentioned “people” not a militia. The comma separates the two ideas ....


11 posted on 03/05/2010 12:39:37 PM PST by SkyDancer (If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
This is what Police Superintendent Jody Weis said in regard to the ruling striking down a Washington, D.C. handgun ban: "From a law enforcement perspective, this will no doubt make a police officer's job more challenging than it already is, particularly since a firearm is used in 75 percent of all murders committed in the city of Chicago."

Huh?

12 posted on 03/05/2010 12:40:44 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan; All

The right to bear arms is absolute and shall not be infringed...http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2463599/posts


15 posted on 03/05/2010 12:41:26 PM PST by raptor22 (The truth will set us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I cannot believe you failed to put a barf alert here.


16 posted on 03/05/2010 12:42:02 PM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Dear Ms. Hillman:

You don't like guns? Then don't buy one.

18 posted on 03/05/2010 12:42:22 PM PST by Cheburashka (Stephen Decatur: you want barrels of gunpowder as tribute, you must expect cannonballs with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I’m only dismayed it wasn’t overturned by state law .


19 posted on 03/05/2010 12:42:35 PM PST by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
I wonder what she thought of another "anti-gun" journalist?

20 posted on 03/05/2010 12:42:43 PM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Ms Hillman is an IDIOT!

What is so hard to understand in the following:

“the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

Seems pretty damn clear to me.

And in any case, the purpose of the 2nd amendment is not to allow the People to protect themselves from criminals. It is to allow them to protect themselves from THEIR GOVERNMENT!!!!


22 posted on 03/05/2010 12:43:42 PM PST by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
In other words, those serving in a militia - or in the present - a branch of the Armed Services - have the right to bear arms. Of course, I cannot prove that my reading of the amendment is correct -- but gun rights supporters cannot prove that the right to bear arms extends to people who are not in the military!

WWII would have been entirely different if the founding fathers had overlooked creating the "right" for the military to have guns, we missed a bullet on that one guys, golf clubs, baseball bats and pocket knives would never have defeated the Nazis.

23 posted on 03/05/2010 12:43:44 PM PST by ansel12 (Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan; All
Handgun ban should stay in Chicago

Fine. As long as Daley's Security Detail turns in all of their guns too. If we can't have them, neither can he. (but you would probably be opposed to this wouldn't you Ms. Hillman?)

Effin scumbag.
24 posted on 03/05/2010 12:44:17 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
I am dismayed that Carol Hillman wants to maintain a safe working environment for rapists, murderers, robbers, and other thugs.

I am unsurprised that Jody Weis wishes to protect armed thugs from self-defending citizens ... she's just protecting the Blue Gang's turf.

25 posted on 03/05/2010 12:44:41 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Hey, I'm with ya, Carol! Yep, the 2nd Amendment only pertains to those who serve or served. Because after all it states the "right to keep and bear arms" in there. So you gonna support me going back to the base and claiming the M4 and M9s that I was issued? C'mon fellow soldiers, let's go get our FULLY AUTOMATIC weapons that Carol so rightly points out we get to KEEP! No need to return them, the 2nd Amendment says so!
26 posted on 03/05/2010 12:45:31 PM PST by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson