[Non-Sequitur]

If it’s a documentary then why is she contacting reality show producers? Surely she can find some people at National Geographic who have actually done documentaries before?

[mnehring]

If it’s a documentary then why is she contacting reality show producers?

Because reality producers have a track record of producing shows that can hit a 20 share while National Geographic is lucky to get a MSNBC level viewership. Anyway, most of these producers cross over. The label 'reality show producer' is just something the article slaps on them- they are just producers. Mark Burnett has a very diverse portfolio.

[maine-iac7]

If it’s a documentary then why is she contacting reality show producers? Surely she can find some people at National Geographic who have actually done documentaries before?

Maybe she wants to avoid the outfits that are wont to put their political spin into whatever they do????

Hmmmm?

I sure trust HER judgment over - ah, say - yours.

[mnehring]

Surely she can find some people at National Geographic who have actually done documentaries before?

National Geographic? In other words, you would rather it use taxpayer PBS funding? How Conservative of you.

[USS Alaska]

If it’s a documentary then why is she contacting reality show producers? Surely she can find some people at National Geographic who have actually done documentaries before?

Maybe she wants a real audience to watch it.

Sarah can draw a large audience, even on over the air TV.

Larger share ratings mean more money.

You've been around FR for 10 years, surely you can find a rational question before you post.

Get help from someone from National Rational Thought Institute, someone that's actually posted a rational question.

[Bigtigermike]

He also does documentaries as well, he did in the past and most recently, you dont like Palin and you will use any small non-issue to discredit her, but you actually drive some on here away with such DU and Daily Kos talking points