Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New charge on dinner tab is in bad taste
The Chicago Tribune ^ | February 28, 2010 | Ed Perkins

Posted on 03/03/2010 5:43:27 PM PST by Cheap_Hessian

Nothing succeeds in the travel industry like a bad idea. The latest hidden mandatory add-on is a "health" charge added to restaurant bills. As far as I know, this scam cropped up first in San Francisco, but you can count on it to spread.

The rationale for this one is to cover the employers' mandatory contribution to the City's "Healthy San Francisco" health-coverage system. The charge actually is levied on employers, but at least some restaurants are adding a few dollars or percentage points to each customer's bill to cover this charge.

The restaurants' excuse for assessing this charge separately is to let customers know how much they're paying for employees' health coverage. That's the same excuse hotels use when they add "resort" or "housekeeping" fees to unsuspecting guests' room bills. It's the same excuse airlines would use to exclude fuel surcharges from their advertised fares if the Department of Transportation would allow them. And it's sheer nonsense. Employees' health insurance is no less of a cost of doing business than rent, property taxes, food costs, security services and all the other inputs businesses require to operate. To single out health care for a separate surcharge is unwarranted.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hiddenfees; restaurants; travel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 03/03/2010 5:43:28 PM PST by Cheap_Hessian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

Hey! What a surprise! Business taxes get passed on to the consumer. Who knew?


2 posted on 03/03/2010 5:45:25 PM PST by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

I suspect they may come up short on tips


3 posted on 03/03/2010 5:45:31 PM PST by rjones42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian
The restaurants' excuse for assessing this charge separately is to let customers know how much they're paying for employees' health coverage. That's the same excuse hotels use when they add "resort" or "housekeeping" fees to unsuspecting guests' room bills. It's the same excuse airlines would use to exclude fuel surcharges from their advertised fares if the Department of Transportation would allow them. And it's sheer nonsense. Employees' health insurance is no less of a cost of doing business than rent, property taxes, food costs, security services and all the other inputs businesses require to operate. To single out health care for a separate surcharge is unwarranted.

I agree with the restaurants. Why should they hide the tax that the government is making them pay? I think the Tribune is upset that the restaurant would actually blame their higher prices on the state.

4 posted on 03/03/2010 5:45:32 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjones42
“I suspect they may come up short on tips”

I would not only not leave a tip but let the management know that his establishment is permanently off limits!

5 posted on 03/03/2010 5:48:36 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

I guess you can add things like pulling the chair out, seating customer charge. Or how about a pouring you water charge. Or maybe giving you a menu charge or a charge for just looking at the menu, a condiments charge (salt and pepper and whatever provided) perhaps the “is everything Ok charge”, the clearing the table for dessert charge, then of course there’s the giving you the bill charge, service not included charge .....


6 posted on 03/03/2010 5:49:16 PM PST by SkyDancer (If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Wonder what they charge to use the Ladies Room?? LOL!

(TP and Washing Hands Expense??)

7 posted on 03/03/2010 5:52:33 PM PST by BossLady (POLITICS - Showbiz for Ugly People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian
The rationale for this one is to cover the employers' mandatory contribution to the City's "Healthy San Francisco" health-coverage system. The charge actually is levied on employers, but at least some restaurants are adding a few dollars or percentage points to each customer's bill to cover this charge.

I actually agree with restaurants slapping this on the bill like they are. Anytime expenses increase, it is reflected in cost- in this case the city's health tax is charged to the restaurant so logically, they have to pay for it somehow. This way, diners can see right in front of their face how much these policies cost them.

8 posted on 03/03/2010 5:54:46 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

.
bttt


9 posted on 03/03/2010 5:54:53 PM PST by Touch Not the Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

So you would rather this charge just be slipped in with the price of the meal? Seems like they are making a stand pointing out the kind of expense the city government is levying on them.


10 posted on 03/03/2010 5:55:52 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

Actually, I applaud it: the clowns who vote for socialism should see its results.


11 posted on 03/03/2010 5:56:13 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

I would like to see the price of otherwise-hidden taxes printed on all reciepts for all purchases. Especially fuel purchases.


12 posted on 03/03/2010 5:56:22 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

Ever since my city added a 10% resturant tax, I have not set foot in one or McD’s, About 10 yrs now.


13 posted on 03/03/2010 5:57:30 PM PST by MrPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

I’m with you on this, surprised more Freepers aren’t. One of the problems with so many of our taxes are that they are invisible to most people. Put it in their faces, and they might get a clue (although that’s very unlikely in SF).


14 posted on 03/03/2010 5:57:42 PM PST by piytar (Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

As long as these fees are known to the customer before any purchase is made then what’s the problem?


15 posted on 03/03/2010 5:58:41 PM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

These are ‘taxes’ to treat the sexual degenerates in the bizarro world of Frisco. Why any healthy, normal person would willingly live in California much less a diseased hole like SF is beyond a rationale.


16 posted on 03/03/2010 5:58:48 PM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
I'll bet they are double charging!

They originally figure it into their costs and have just found out a new way to raise prices!

17 posted on 03/03/2010 6:01:22 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

“This way, diners can see right in front of their face how much these policies cost them. “

I’d be ok with it, if they did it upfront - but you and I both know what people would do with an upfront greeting like: “We’re adding a $5.00 service fee for health insurance if you choose to dine here”

They would be out of business in a week.

It’s tacky to wait until the bill is presented for diners to find that the restaurant can’t handle it’s business.


18 posted on 03/03/2010 6:02:19 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

The restaurants didn’t mandate the charge, the stupid government did. Just like a local gas station puts on their pumps “$.55 of every gallon is tax”.


19 posted on 03/03/2010 6:02:24 PM PST by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

I’ll bet they don’t even serve Rice-A-Roni anymore, “The San Francisco Treat”.

Bastards.


20 posted on 03/03/2010 6:03:54 PM PST by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson