Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giant California pension funds may lower earnings expectations
SacBee ^ | 03/03/10 | Dale Kasler

Posted on 03/03/2010 8:12:01 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

Giant California pension funds may lower earnings expectations

dkasler@sacbee.com

Published Wednesday, Mar. 03, 2010

Bruised by heavy losses and wary of the economic road ahead, California's two big public pension funds are considering reducing their official forecasts of future investment results.

Such changes would have huge implications for taxpayers and public employees. A reduction in the investment projections would put more pressure on taxpayers and workers to support the two retirement systems, which already are significantly under-funded. The less the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the California State Teachers' Retirement System believe they'll earn from their investments, the more they have to depend on other sources.

For instance, CalSTRS long has assumed it would earn 8 percent a year on its investments – but is now being urged by consultants to scale back that figure. Board members are sweating the potential impact.

"If we go less than 8 percent, we're going to make it up where?" board member Kathy Brugger asked her colleagues at a meeting last month. The board plans to decide in September if it should lower the estimate.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: bailout; california; pensionfund; shortfall

1 posted on 03/03/2010 8:12:01 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; PAR35; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; happygrl; ...

P!


2 posted on 03/03/2010 8:12:32 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“If we go less than 8 percent, we’re going to make it up where?”

BY REDUCING BENEFITS, preferably to the limits in Social Security and Medicare like we the Serf’s.


3 posted on 03/03/2010 8:16:01 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Unions are run by liberals.

Liberals are that way because they cannot understand math or economics.

Why should I pay for their stupidity?

PAY YOUR OWN WAYS, LIBERAL SLIME.


4 posted on 03/03/2010 8:16:59 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
“If we go less than 8 percent, we’re going to make it up where?”Arnold is going to start transfering an additional 5% of gross pay to the retirement funds. A person who makes $50,000 per year is going be paying an additional $2,500 to the pension fund, in addition to what they pay now. He is also going to cut pay 5%. So a state worker making $50,000 today is going to be making $45,000 from now on, with half that difference going into the pension fund.
5 posted on 03/03/2010 8:21:52 AM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 43... 42... 41...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
The less the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the California State Teachers' Retirement System believe they'll earn from their investments, the more they have to depend on other sources.

These nitwits just don't get it. Why are their investments doing poor, is because the very bunch of liberals have destroyed California. Add the almost total destruction withing the communists Federal Government in control now, and you have no choice. Reduce benefits like all the rest of us Americans had to.

6 posted on 03/03/2010 8:26:50 AM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Not good enough, how about this instead:
No Public Servant or Public Employee shall be entitled to nor receive any Taxpayer Funded Retirement Benefit in excess of Social Security and Medicare Benefits paid.


7 posted on 03/03/2010 8:27:22 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If they are going to just make up forecast numbers, why not use 16%?


8 posted on 03/03/2010 8:49:29 AM PST by razorback-bert ( if you're doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson