Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD: SARAH PALIN on LENO (Sneak preview & FReepers are there)!!!!
NBC ^ | March 2, 2010 | onyx

Posted on 03/02/2010 7:13:48 PM PST by onyx

SEE THE MESSAGE ON SARAH'S HAND HERE!

11:30:PM Eastern

10:30:PM Central

(Excerpt) Read more at nbc.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Free Republic
KEYWORDS: americassweetheart; bluejeanstacky; cheerleaders; fameandmoney; frontofmyhand; funandgames; greatjeansdebate; hesmarriedsheaint; highratings; hotchick; istoddlonesome; jaysuckseggs; jealousdems; keywordtrollsorama; lachapter; leno; losangeles; luvfest4sara; nicebuttjeans; noteleprompters; onehotmama; orgasmthread; paidtrolls4axelrod; paidtrolls4bhussein; paidtrolls4rahm; paidtrolls4soros; palin; palin2012; palinleno; palinlenofreep; partimemom; rondog; sarah; sarahpalin; sarahsuperstar; screamparty; senorapalin; weeweedobama; yourocksarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 861-862 next last
To: Christian4Bush

What a day to celebrate with ‘a first’. Maybe by then you can come up w/a special drink and call it Sarah! It’s has to be strong and sweet! ;) You’ll need a little inside info but getting married on the day she announces she’s running will, also, be a day to celebrate! Conservatives are SO LONG OVERDUE for some celebration.


721 posted on 03/03/2010 9:45:56 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
I wear DARK WASH jeans...Ask anyone in fashion.

Well, you appear to be a dead fish going with the flow! SARAH makes trends, she doesn't follow them. And that bothers you a GREAT deal!
722 posted on 03/03/2010 9:54:21 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Don’t worry Nutmeg I just saw on Drudge report that Leno beat Letterman in the ratings after last night show


723 posted on 03/03/2010 10:05:59 AM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

He needs to dress appropriately. His voters are shallow and they have something to focus on - they couldn’t bear focusing on him/his record, he’d be exposed nekked!


724 posted on 03/03/2010 10:07:46 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
seem insistent that nobody should be allowed to dislike Sarah’s jeans.

Say it honestly - anyone that focuses on her jeans SO MUCH is really not focusing at all! They put themselves in the 'empty head' category much like the liberal media. They can't handle conservative values - so they 'focus' in on the trivia!
725 posted on 03/03/2010 10:21:57 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]

To: Republic
I don't want Sarah to be a fashionista in the extreme.
EXACTLY, Republic!

Particularly not in this venue.

The "Tonight Show" is a place for "Sarah Palin UNPLUGGED" -- like she is a guest in your home.

Dressy casual, I think they call it. :o)

(But what do **I** know about fashion.)


726 posted on 03/03/2010 10:26:16 AM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 718 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
She’s 46. At that age — DARK WASH JEANS ONLY. That’s all.

Sarah came off well in those jeans.

Sarah has an athletic runners build. She's not your average 46 year-old woman.

Perhaps you should not judge Sarah by those 46 year-old female body shapes that you are more familiar with.

727 posted on 03/03/2010 10:38:41 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: RonDog

I say she has an athlete’s body and looks good in anything! Age has nothing to do with it.


728 posted on 03/03/2010 10:43:29 AM PST by hattend (The era of John McCain is over, the era of Ronald Reagan is back! Go Sarah Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
It was always my complaint that the one guy who we KNEW was corrupted by campaign donations (the Keating 5), was the one arguing that none of his colleagues could be trusted not to be corrupted by campaign donations. And the media would always tell us how he knew “personally” the temptations of too much money in politics, as if being corruptable was a prerequisite for being able to fix corruption. But I acknowledge that my point was somewhat obscure.

Actually Chazmodius, your point was clear, I just disagreed with it.

McCain was cleared of any Keating 5 wrong doing.

As I said, a better comparison would have been McCain talking with Dave about first amendment rights. There are of course plenty of other examples about McCain.

BTW, why did you change the subject, from the absurdity of Mitt talking with Dave about health care?

729 posted on 03/03/2010 10:48:16 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

I was just continuing with the “That’s like OJ discussing Domestic Violence” riff. The subject wasn’t changed.


730 posted on 03/03/2010 11:00:16 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 729 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Sure, at some level, EVERY government program is an entitlement to me, since I pay taxes, but it doesn’t make sense to suggest that I should argue that government should keep it’s hands off of every program they run that I don’t get my “fair share” out of.

You are setting up a straw man fallacy and not addressing the point.

Medicare and FICA were passed as a promise of health insurance for people of a certain age. If you promise health insurance, pass a law to pay for it, take money from people's paychecks to pay for it and then you don't supply the individual service up to the point of value that was individually paid, then the slogan, "keep your hands off my Medicare" is appropriate.

731 posted on 03/03/2010 11:03:56 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 707 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

On McCain, he was admonished for his involvement, even though he was cleared of rules violations. However, he used that as an example of how “good men” could get drawn into corruption because of campaign contributions.

Rather than accept that his own failings were his problem, he decided that if HE could be corrupted, then obviously everybody else could be corrupted, and he used that as his basis for pushing CFR.

Fact is, he didn’t really do anything wrong in Keating 5. His error was in pushing CFR, and pretending that everybody else couldn’t be trusted just because of his involvement with Keating.


732 posted on 03/03/2010 11:04:31 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 729 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I was just continuing with the “That’s like OJ discussing Domestic Violence” riff. The subject wasn’t changed.

True, I'll give you that. :)

733 posted on 03/03/2010 11:06:27 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 730 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

SCHIP was promised as health insurance for people of a certain age, paid for by taxes with the promise that those taxes would fund a certain level of insurance.

Does that mean that if we tried to cut back the SCHIP program, we would be doing the wrong thing?

I know there is a slight difference, in that the taxes “dedicated” to pay for SCHIP are not necessarily paid by the people who get benefits from the program, while Medicare is universal, and therefore everybody who benefits could have paid taxes for it. But everybody who benefits from anything government does, who pays taxes, can say the same thing.

And many many programs of the government start out with some change to the tax laws to fund them, and promises about what the programs will do with those taxes.

So I still say it is funny to hear someone complain about the government having their hands on medicare.

People always want the government programs that they benefit from to remain untouched, or increased. They will always argue that “I paid taxes for that program”, and therefore deserve the benefits from the program.

And it is true that medicare is such a big program, that it has crowded out virtually ALL OTHER INSURANCE for people over 65, so you can’t realistically cut it at this point.

But realize that your argument could be used 5 years from now if we take over the white house and house and senate, and try to revoke Obamacare.

Medicare is the perfect example of how government sticks its nose where it doesn’t belong, takes over, and becomes an irrevocable force, to the point where people have to care about what government does on a daily basis.

I want to live in a day when I don’t really CARE who is President, because there’s nothing he or congress can really do to bother me.


734 posted on 03/03/2010 11:11:38 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 731 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

I’m not your typical 50 year-old woman. I’m a size 0.

Regardless of size, dark wash, straight cut (no flare) on national TV is the best choice. That’s all I’m saying.

Of course she looks good in jeans. Besides, her jacket covered up her mid-section so all that could be seen is her legs.


735 posted on 03/03/2010 11:12:58 AM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 727 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
But realize that your argument could be used 5 years from now if we take over the white house and house and senate, and try to revoke Obamacare.

Absolutely not.

We should revoke Obamacare if it is passed and we should give people back the money that they put into it.

I would gladly welcome Obama ending Medicare, as long as he doesn't start a new entitlement and as long as he reimburses those who were promised health insurance, who payed for it and who didn't receive the promised service that they individually paid for.

736 posted on 03/03/2010 11:19:40 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 734 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
I’m not your typical 50 year-old woman. I’m a size 0.

Got a pic?

jk. :)

737 posted on 03/03/2010 11:20:41 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 735 | View Replies]

To: Jemian
"TODD PALIN IS A HUNK! ping list."

I do, I do!!! Put me on!

738 posted on 03/03/2010 11:27:30 AM PST by oprahstheantichrist (The MSM is a demonic stronghold, PLEASE pray accordingly - 2 Corinthians 10:3-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: RonDog; Danae; Arizona Carolyn; McGavin999; Lakeshark; GOP_Lady; All

I’m so glad I have it on TIVO!

After reading all the comments about her jeans, I looked and they’re not only a perfect fit, they’re what we wear here. Sheesh.

Sarah looked fabulous as always!

RonDog, should we search for your after report or await a ping? *wink*


739 posted on 03/03/2010 11:37:09 AM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 726 | View Replies]

To: GrandmaPatriot
Days after Obama was warned during a check-up to avoid high-fat foods...

I also read where he was told to brush his teeth twice a day, which was an indicator that he didn't. Eeeww, how bad is his personal hygiene?


According to his wife, he is snorey and stinky.

740 posted on 03/03/2010 11:51:29 AM PST by Albion Wilde (Liberals love the poor so much they came up w/ a plan to create millions more of them. - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 690 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 861-862 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson