Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: highlander_UW

The real “progressives” want it to be a “national right”.

Leftist Joining with the NRA: http://www.newsweek.com/id/234185

The reaffirming and getting conservatives attached to the principle of “incorporation” has far more dire consequences to limited government then you know.

This is in fact a Pyrrhic victory.
The Court should be Overturning “incorporation” NOT reaffirming it!
Now the Idiots in the NRA will be solidly on the side of maintainable “incorporation”. Gun rights wont be safe either because now not only will the States have them “reasonable exceptions” to gun rights, the Federal government will have EXACTLY the same justification to impose the same “reasonable exceptions”.

Only the federal government will uses them “reasonable exceptions” not just to Disarm the individual people of weapons capable of standing up to them, but our States as well making us utterly helpless against the federal government!

Just encase you don’t believe that will happen your already too late as it has already begun

Remember the Tennessee Guardsman?: http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/constitution/2807-rich-hamblen-challenges-the-supreme-court-to-uphold-the-second-amendment

Incorporating the 2nd amendment has just made it much harder for usurpations like this to be overturn.

Anyone who thinks this is a good thing is a short sighted fool!


48 posted on 03/02/2010 8:47:44 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Monorprise

see 54...thats been my gut since they accepted this case, after the wishy washy heller opinions...


58 posted on 03/02/2010 9:28:59 PM PST by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Monorprise
Now the Idiots in the NRA will be solidly on the side of maintainable “incorporation”. Gun rights wont be safe either because now not only will the States have them “reasonable exceptions” to gun rights, the Federal government will have EXACTLY the same justification to impose the same “reasonable exceptions”.

I'm sure that there will be another court case on the meaning of the word "infringed," and the Ninth Circuit will rule that "infringed" means "shot all to bloody hell," while the Fifth Circuit will rule that it means "unsullied by government law or regulation," and that glaring conflict between the Circuits will be a key basis for granting certiorari.

Like Heller, this case is not the end of the battle, it's the beginning, though it looks to become a major victory and a foundation for what's to come.

64 posted on 03/03/2010 2:07:36 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson