I'm sure that there will be another court case on the meaning of the word "infringed," and the Ninth Circuit will rule that "infringed" means "shot all to bloody hell," while the Fifth Circuit will rule that it means "unsullied by government law or regulation," and that glaring conflict between the Circuits will be a key basis for granting certiorari.
Like Heller, this case is not the end of the battle, it's the beginning, though it looks to become a major victory and a foundation for what's to come.
This is why I hate lawyers and most judges.
The 2A could not be more clear if you tried wordsmithing it, yet all of these people dance around what it truly means.