Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush says he won't criticize Obama
Washington Times ^ | Saturday, February 27, 2010

Posted on 03/02/2010 6:59:29 AM PST by meandog

FORT WORTH, Texas | Former President George W. Bush turned to his faith amid the tough times during his eight years in office, he said Saturday at a religious school's banquet.

"I don't see how I could be president without prayer," he told the crowd of more than 1,100 at the Fort Worth Christian School event at a downtown hotel. "The prayers of the people ... sustained me, comforted me and strengthened me in a way I could have never predicted before becoming president, and for that I am extremely grateful."

Bush, who has had many speaking engagements since moving to Dallas after his presidency, said he doesn't plan on staying in the public eye.

"You won't see me out there opining ... or criticizing my successor," Bush said...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; derangement; syndrome
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: LibLieSlayer

Bush is way smarter than most posters. He understands that, in practical terms, anything that he said would be blown off or distorted by the media.

Also, the system is best served by the bench becoming everyday players. In addition, there is a tradition of letting the former presidents stepping aside to allow the former VPs to becoming one of the chief spokespersons.

Bush is not only being gracious, he is being sensible and acknowledging past American history and political practices. It’s also gratifying because, by his actions, he’s saying that the real power should be bubbling up from below, and not residing within an oligarchy of guys whose time has passed.


21 posted on 03/02/2010 7:41:26 AM PST by qwertypie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: meandog
If Bush starts criticizing Obama like Carter, or Clinton, criticized Bush the issue becomes all about Bush. Bush isn't the leader of the party anymore, Bush isn't running for President, Bush isn't hoping for a Nobel Prize, Bush doesn't want a position at the U.N.

Why do you want to make this all about him? Never mind, I answered my own question.

22 posted on 03/02/2010 7:47:38 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: meandog

This public is not worthy of this man.


23 posted on 03/02/2010 7:51:49 AM PST by lonestar67 ("I love my country a lot more than I love politics," President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Unfortunately, he also wouldn’t stand up for himself during his 8 years in the White House! Credit that for dem victories in ‘06 and ‘08.


24 posted on 03/02/2010 7:56:23 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
If Bush starts criticizing Obama like Carter, or Clinton, criticized Bush the issue becomes all about Bush. Bush isn't the leader of the party anymore, Bush isn't running for President, Bush isn't hoping for a Nobel Prize, Bush doesn't want a position at the U.N. Why do you want to make this all about him? Never mind, I answered my own question.

One can "turn the cheek" once and still have class; but turning it twice and he/she turns having class into acting like an ass! This isn't a new thing in history nor is it isolated to DimocRATS...Please note that Theodore Roosevelt didn't hesitate to criticize Woodrow Wilson as weak and incompetent!

25 posted on 03/02/2010 7:59:47 AM PST by meandog (OWEbummercare: "Arbeit Macht Frei!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: meandog

I have a question (for the entire forum): assume you are a Third Party malcontent, or some other True Conservative™. At which stage of the five stages of grief do you find yourself now that Bush has left office?


26 posted on 03/02/2010 8:02:57 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
had he only fought back.

I agree. The scriptures endorse exposing evil.

27 posted on 03/02/2010 8:11:43 AM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
If you're supposing that I prefer Bush to Obama, then you suppose correctly. That is not, however, an affirmation of affection for “Double-peeyew” as I consider him an abysmal failure in all respects.
28 posted on 03/02/2010 8:23:57 AM PST by meandog (OWEbummercare: "Arbeit Macht Frei!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: meandog

He doesn’t have to - obama’s behavior speaks volumes.


29 posted on 03/02/2010 8:34:22 AM PST by mombonn (God is looking for spiritual fruit, not religious nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bad Jack Bauer

“It comes down to personality. I will never forget the 2004 vice-presidential debate where Cheney completely dismantled Edwards. He did it so methodically and quietly, it was scary.”

And after he had finished debating w/Leiberman, my wife and turned to each other, mightily impressed, and said, “So how come THESE two guys don’t get to run the country?”


30 posted on 03/02/2010 8:47:40 AM PST by Clioman (wHAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clioman; Bad Jack Bauer
“It comes down to personality. I will never forget the 2004 vice-presidential debate where Cheney completely dismantled Edwards. He did it so methodically and quietly, it was scary.”

And after he had finished debating w/Leiberman, my wife and turned to each other, mightily impressed, and said, “So how come THESE two guys don’t get to run the country

It's not only a matter of personality but also one of being mad as hell and not going to take it anymore. If the roles were reversed (and Cheney was the ex-president and Bush the ex-vice president) I still believe that Cheney would be letting Hussein have it as there appears to be a bulldoggish attitude about turning the cheek just so often with Cheney. Bush, of course, would roll up into a Dan Quayle mantra and say nothing.

31 posted on 03/02/2010 10:37:45 AM PST by meandog (OWEbummercare: "Arbeit Macht Frei!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: meandog; Titan Magroyne

As the comments in this topic prove, “W” can’t ever do the right thing in the eyes of some, left or right. It’s that old Lincoln quote with “please the people”, substituted for “fool the people”. “Can’t do it, not gonna do it, wouldn’t be prudent”, to quote a comedian, quoting his Dad.

While not my favorite President, he’s a good man that I respect and love, and yeah, sometimes I wished he’d have just gone all “Ann Coulter” on the left - but, I won’t criticize him for his principals. Like many, I see it as a class, but even if he went “nucular” on Obama, he’d have his detractors on both sides.

That he said (and I believe sincerely), “The prayers of the people ... sustained me, comforted me and strengthened me ... “, is why I love the man - not his politics, his speech patterns, his class or his lack of. God bless him.


32 posted on 03/02/2010 2:14:29 PM PST by Drumbo ("Democracy can withstand anything but democrats." - Jubal Harshaw (Robert A. Heinlein))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Whatever issues I have with President Bush, he’s sure got a lot more class than any Democrat ex-President.


33 posted on 03/02/2010 2:17:18 PM PST by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qwertypie
Bush is not only being gracious, he is being sensible and acknowledging past American history and political practices. It’s also gratifying because, by his actions, he’s saying that the real power should be bubbling up from below, and not residing within an oligarchy of guys whose time has passed.

Oh, right. And this has nothing whatsoever to do with the NWO dog and pony show. /sarcasm

Do you ACTUALLY believe that the POTUS (any of them) ACTUALLY control what goes on in this world? Sheeeesh!!!!

34 posted on 03/02/2010 2:24:44 PM PST by SlightOfTongue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Yes, a true failure, and we the people must pay for his inadequacies.


35 posted on 03/02/2010 3:21:50 PM PST by Theodore R. (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: qwertypie
Yeah... turning the other cheek worked really well in the 21st Century body politic... did it not? Not defending himself and those that supported him cost him his agenda and led to obama winning.

LLS

36 posted on 03/02/2010 7:11:24 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Drumbo

Whether I agreed with his politics, I never questioned Bush’s humility and sincerity in faith. Unlike his predecessor he didn’t don religion for political expediency; unlike his successor, faith and love of country are not exclusive.


37 posted on 03/03/2010 5:57:05 AM PST by Titan Magroyne (Freedom is taken, not given.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson