Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Oh, my. What's next.
1 posted on 03/01/2010 7:46:57 AM PST by HDCochran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: HDCochran

Has to be approved by Congress.


28 posted on 03/01/2010 7:56:39 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

Bunk.
Where is the Senate ?


37 posted on 03/01/2010 8:00:01 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

Barry’s Big Sale!

Prices Reduced 99%!

Islamic Incentives if you buy now!!

We tote the note!!

Everything must go!


38 posted on 03/01/2010 8:00:36 AM PST by GeronL (Political Philosophy: I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

And, in other news, the Obozo administration has agreed to the sale of all the “excess” nuclear warheads to Iran.


39 posted on 03/01/2010 8:00:54 AM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran
The kind of reductions I'd like to see is in the number of half-black, arrogant, neo-marxist a##holes in the presidency......soon.
41 posted on 03/01/2010 8:01:47 AM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

This SOB isn’t going to be happy until he gets us all KILLED!


43 posted on 03/01/2010 8:02:58 AM PST by Constitution Day (Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran
This might no be as bad as every thinks. From my understanding we have something like 2,800 nukes in our arsenal. We could eliminate quite a few of these and still have enough to blow up the world a few dozen times.

If done properly (which it probably won't be) we could save on the cost of maintaining and storing these weapons. Normally this would mean the savings is passed on to the tax payer but most liking the cost saving will go to something like ACORN.

45 posted on 03/01/2010 8:06:47 AM PST by A Texan (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

well,...the military leaders just need to go on record what they think is needed to win whatever is expected, based on growth of militaristic states, otherwise they have failed in their oath. And if the president disagrees, then the american people will decide who is right in 2012. Or congress impeaches.


46 posted on 03/01/2010 8:06:57 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

Dismantling the United States, one brick at a time.


49 posted on 03/01/2010 8:12:28 AM PST by Lazamataz (Seriously. The only way Obama can possibly pull this out is to declare Martial Law before November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

Well, according to the msm, since the messiah was elected and the evil Bush and Cheney are gone, the world loves us again. Therefore, who needs nukes? We can beat them into plowshares.


50 posted on 03/01/2010 8:12:36 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran
Somebody should let Jack Bauer know that it is NOT the Russians that are selling fissile material in the US. We now know that it is Obama. Can we please get Jack focused on cleaning up the right mess??? PLEASE.
51 posted on 03/01/2010 8:13:20 AM PST by USMA '71 ((Re-elect no one!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

If this isn’t grounds for impeachment and removal, as he is tasked with protecting and defending the Constitution and this nation, I don’t know what is.


52 posted on 03/01/2010 8:13:30 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

No one should be surprised. This was not “unexpected”. Nobama continues to get us to third world status.


54 posted on 03/01/2010 8:14:33 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

Something has to give with this bastard. I see a showdown by July.


55 posted on 03/01/2010 8:14:59 AM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...

The list, ping


58 posted on 03/01/2010 8:20:05 AM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

Healthcare, an Assault Weapons Ban, Immigration “Reform” (AKA Amnesty), and now a surrender to the world by giving up our nukes.


59 posted on 03/01/2010 8:20:59 AM PST by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran
Wouldn't be so bad if I thought he had a credible plan for building up U.S. military strength in materiel, manpower, and morale.

Which, if course, he isn't.

The rest of the article is here:

US plans 'dramatic reductions' in nuclear weapons

US President Barack Obama is planning "dramatic reductions" in the country's nuclear arsenal, says a senior US administration official.

This comes as part of a sweeping policy review designed to prevent the spread of atomic weapons.

The review "will point to dramatic reductions in the stockpile, while maintaining a strong and reliable deterrent," the official said.

He added that it will lead to a greater role for conventional weapons.

President Obama is to meet his defence secretary, Robert Gates, later on Monday to discuss the new nuclear strategy.

Officials say thousands of nuclear weapons could be cut, many by retiring weapons that are now kept in storage.

They say the new strategy will be an important step towards Mr Obama's declared aim of reversing the spread of nuclear weapons and seeking a world without them.

60 posted on 03/01/2010 8:22:49 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (ANTHROPOGENIC CONTINENTAL DRIFT: for when global warming isn't silly enough anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

Can 2012 hurry and get here already.


62 posted on 03/01/2010 8:28:00 AM PST by IMissPresidentReagan (Let us not get bogged down in the small squabbles; Let us get caught up in the big ideas. Palin '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran

Well let’s review:

Comrade 0bama is engineering the greatest economic meltdown ever seen in modern history and the painful reality is that there is fast approaching a point where the federal government will be unable to meet it’s obligations, i.e., social security, federal pensions, military payroll, and much much more.

Comrade 0bama is apparently planning to ‘drastically’ reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the U.S. arsenal, a move that is ill advised for many reasons.

Comrade 0bama and his thugs are seeking to exert greater and greater control over the population via executive orders if the Congress won’t rubber stamp what that Communist piece of sh*t has in mind.

Put it all together and you have the prospect of a military government stepping in to ‘preserve, protect and defend’ the Constitution of the United States by arresting the Kenyan wonder boy and his co-conspirators, destination: Fort Leavenworth or more appropriately: Gitmo.

The final firewall against this Communist/0bamunist tyranny is the United States Armed Forces and I for one do not think they’re going to let us down.


63 posted on 03/01/2010 8:28:35 AM PST by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HDCochran
We are being disarmed, from within, and no one seems to care.

Bill Clinton lied under oath about a blowjob, and got impeached...and here is a (questionable American) president, taking down the banking system, dismantling private enterprise, taking over healthcare, and now disarming us, and no one is doing a f****** thing about it.

Tea party Sign


Will the last American to leave North America please bring the flag?


65 posted on 03/01/2010 8:33:30 AM PST by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson