Posted on 02/28/2010 5:36:12 PM PST by presidio9
It takes some serious stupid to label someone who quotes Marx as a “right-winger.”
Whenever the left publishes these little lists of white guys who are terrorists they conveniently forget that this guy's motive was to destroy capitalism.
Also, I am an Irish Catholic who has worked for the past ten years with a charity that brings Protestant and Catholic children to the states to live together for a summer. I hate all terrorism, and I hate the IRA. But I get annoyed when the left equate's the IRA with al Qaeda. Virtually all the deaths that occured during the troubles where from gunfire, and occasionally grenades. When the IRA DID plant a bomb (in Belfast or the UK) they had a longstanding policy of calling it in, so the building could be evacuated, and no innocents were injured. I am certainly not excusing them, but does this sound like something an Islamic terrorist would do?
Loomis might want to start doing a little more research before he opens his big mouth.
Liberalism has been terrorizing and killing people for at least fifty years. A great deal of the rise in violence and murders in the last fifty years can be placed squarely on liberals who were soft on crime. And every time some mother kills her kids because they’re a “burden”, you can thank a liberal.
Bill Ayres.
Progressives are active users of Orwell's New Speak.
I would not call him a right winger. Right wingers are not anti-capitalist.
Was Stack registered as a Republican or a Democrat?
Stack was a Bush hating anarchist.
Loomis apparently didn’t read Stack’s statement...stack was not a fan of capitalism, or America. Conservatives are fans of both things.
Excuse me .. but the premise is: Joe Stack is right wing.
I reject that premise .. and call it what it is: A BIG FAT LIE.
The left is so paranoid they are trying to convince people that Joe Stack is right wing .. when I believe the general public already knows he was NOT!!
I could not find a voting record, so either he was unregistered and hadn’t voted since moving to Texas or that someone scrubbed the record.
If I had a nickle for every leftwing crazy, and subtracted a nickle for every rightwing crazy, I’d still be a rich man.
someone didnt take their medicine today..
This is nothing to make light of as this is what the media puts out and the sheeple read. We have got to find a way to go on the attack ourselves, instead of joking about it. I wish there was a way to sue them(class action) or ridicule them.
Time to take these taxpayer stalking “writers” as supporting government and political party based terror cells seriously.
He looks like he would get along well with Elton John, or to put it another way, he probably needs diving weights in his loafers so he doesn’t float away.
You socialist professor and media types are doing this guy joe stack a real disservice.
Leftists want to be known for their activism. The absolute worst thing that could happen to any leftist is a post mortem false accusation robbing them of their rights to what they’ve always lived for—immortality in the media as a leftist activist.
Just sent this to Mr. Loomis:
First off, communists are anti-government when it comes to governments that don’t support their views. Just look at Castro, Ho Chi Minh, and Mao Zedong to name a few; all three led revolutions against goverments.
And what is your idea of “taking right-wing terrorism seriously”, Mr. Loomis? Should the government use force of law to silence “right-wing” radio programs that speak out against government action (isn’t there something called the First Amendment forbidding that)? Should they arrest anyone who protests against government actions (what were your feelings when the left wing was calling for Bush’es assassination?) or who suggest that we are approaching the point where armed revolt is our only option because our government ignores our votes and our protests and continues to grow in power and authority far beyond what the Constitution allows (doesn’t said Constitution state that when government becomes a threat to the people’s freedom, it is the people’s right to dissolve such a government?) Wouldn’t such government action in fact vindicate the very people you claim are the threat, as such actions are the very thing they are warning us about?
Ever ask yourself why some people are advocating these things? Can you honestly look me in the eye and say that our current government is following the Constitution that they all swore to uphold when they took office? The question that should be asked is “Who will take an overreaching government serioulsy?” because right now, I can promise you that that is a bigger threat than a few extremists.
As for the boogeyman “militia” term that your side is so fond of throwing at anyone who holds views of the government you don’t like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGYR7_PII7w
I’m surprised somebody had sex with her at least four times
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.