The question was NOT do you agree with questioning government. She was asked if the government was INVOLVED. Here is the actual question and her clear answer.
GLENN: Right. Heres then let me be more frank and ask you the question: Do you believe the government was any way INVOLVED with the bringing down of the World Trade Centers on 9/11?
MEDINA: I dont, I dont have all of the evidence there,
Hmmmmm. Seems to me that she is saying "I don't have all the evidence." Do you see where she is saying something else?
Glenn. So I dont Im not in a place, I have not been out publicly questioning that. I think some very good questions have been raised in that regard. There are some very good arguments, and I think the American people have not seen all of the evidence there. So Ive not taken a position on that.
Again I see where she is saying that she believes we have not seen all the evidence and because of that she has "Not taken a position on that." How are you seeing it?
GLENN'S SPIN: I think the people of America might think that might be a yes.
MEDINA: Well.....
Try to spin WHAT she said, not what you THOUGHT she said.
Not what I "thought" she said??? I underlined and bolded what she actually said from your very own post. I am very astute at understanding one, two and even some three syllable words. Getting hung up on simple little words like "is" isn't usually a problem for me so that said I don't believe its my spin you need to worry about. Glenn wasn't influencing my thoughts by answering his own question to her for her. She said "I don't have all the answers. I've not taken a position on that" and Glenn said that that answer means yes. How nice of him to draw conclusions for the rest of us don't you think? You're not a judge by any chance are you? I'd sure hate to be found guilty for a crime based upon my pleading the fifth or not saying anything at all. Jesus Christ was condemned the same way don't you know? The innocent usually are.