Skip to comments.
We Can’t Wish Away Climate Change [Al Gore Responds: Wishes "Climate Crisis Were An Illusion"]
NYTimes ^
| February 27, 2010
| Al Gore
Posted on 02/27/2010 9:19:49 PM PST by Steelfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
1
posted on
02/27/2010 9:19:49 PM PST
by
Steelfish
To: Steelfish
He would pick a snow storm to release this editorial.
To: Paleo Conservative
If only AlGore were an illusion.....
To: Steelfish
Al Gore is an illusion! Son of a Soviet spy and devoid of anything approaching a functional brain... HE is the global warming!!!
4
posted on
02/27/2010 9:23:00 PM PST
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: Steelfish
“90 million tons of global-warming pollution every 24 hours into the atmosphere as if it were an open sewer”
Is he referring to that same global-warming pollution he exhales with every breath?
To: Steelfish
The guy is a creepy cynical LIAR.
6
posted on
02/27/2010 9:25:14 PM PST
by
DontTreadOnMe2009
(So stop treading on me already!)
To: Steelfish
....besides, I’m poised to make BILLIONS off Climate deals. Don’t screw with that. :D
-al gore
7
posted on
02/27/2010 9:25:26 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
To: Steelfish
The most major thing which George W. Bush ever did was preventing Algor from becoming a US president.
8
posted on
02/27/2010 9:26:28 PM PST
by
wendy1946
To: Steelfish
Before AGW is said and done, Gore is going to “wish” he had not created the internet. What an idiot hoaxer and scammer. Good grief.
9
posted on
02/27/2010 9:27:20 PM PST
by
cranked
To: Steelfish
And we would still trail China in the race to develop smart grids, fast trains, solar power, wind, geothermal and other renewable sources of energy
So China's going to develop all that technology? AWESOME! That means we don't have to. Let's let them do all the R&D and then steal their technology for a change. Problem solved.
You can't have this both ways. If we're SO CLOSE to a major breakthrough where the entire world can be powered by magic unicorn dust, then we don't need to restrict carbon dioxide emissions at all, any more than we need to restrict the number of 8-track tapes being sold by Ronco.
If these technologies are a LONG WAY OFF, then we'll need all of the fossil fuels we can get to bridge the gap.
Either way, the sensible thing to do is to drill for as much oil as we can find, anywhere we can find it.
To: Steelfish
If Algore admitted that he was wrong, it would cost him $millions!!!
11
posted on
02/27/2010 9:29:45 PM PST
by
LiteKeeper
("It's the peoples' seat!")
To: Steelfish
The science is settled: Its fraud!
12
posted on
02/27/2010 9:29:46 PM PST
by
jd777
To: Steelfish
Al! Al! You need to stop taking your own propaganda so seriously. Throw out all of your “books” and get rid of all of your copies of “An Inconvenient Truth” DVDs. Watch a little FOX News Channel and tune in daily to Rush Limbaugh. Do what Obama said, “Stop watching MSNBC.” You’ll be fine.
13
posted on
02/27/2010 9:32:32 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
("Suitcase Jake" RIP 02-24-10. You were one of a kind good buddy!)
To: Steelfish
Of course, we would still need to deal with the national security risks of our growing dependence on a global oil market dominated by dwindling reserves in the most unstable region of the world, and the economic risks of sending hundreds of billions of dollars a year overseas in return for that oil. And we would still trail China in the race to develop smart grids, fast trains, solar power, wind, geothermal and other renewable sources of energy the most important sources of new jobs in the 21st century. Standard Democrat tactic. When beaten in a argument, change the subject.
14
posted on
02/27/2010 9:34:12 PM PST
by
fhayek
To: Steelfish
Dear Lord this poser is so effed up.
To: Steelfish
To: Steelfish
We would no longer have to worry that our grandchildren would one day look back on us as a criminal generation that had selfishly and blithely ignored clear warnings that their fate was in our hands. I think they'll look upon us as a criminally stupid generation who spent all their money and their kids' money while falling for the GW hoax.
To: Steelfish
18
posted on
02/27/2010 9:45:44 PM PST
by
chris37
To: Steelfish
Algore thinks an illusion might be better than a scam.
19
posted on
02/27/2010 9:47:27 PM PST
by
pallis
To: fhayek
Standard Democrat tactic. When beaten in a argument, change the subject.
Exactly! What does "our growing dependence on a global oil market" have to do with "global warming"?
20
posted on
02/27/2010 9:52:33 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson