Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Last Four Minutes of Air France Flight 447
Spiegel Online ^ | 27 Feb 2010 | Gerald Traufetter

Posted on 02/27/2010 6:50:15 AM PST by lowbuck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
A five page article giving some idea of what happened during the fatal Rio to Paris flight last May.

Enjoy.

1 posted on 02/27/2010 6:50:15 AM PST by lowbuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lowbuck

I know next to nothing about the Airbus but even on smaller aircraft, pitot tubes are heated to prevent these kinds of ice-ups. On a heavy commercial airplane with multiple redundant systems, I would expect the same.


2 posted on 02/27/2010 7:04:57 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck

Heated pitot tubes????


3 posted on 02/27/2010 7:10:02 AM PST by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck

Enjoy.......????

Poor choice of words!!!!


4 posted on 02/27/2010 7:13:22 AM PST by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 101voodoo

Maybe the French Engineers figured “unshaven” would surfice for “heated” to prevent icing.


5 posted on 02/27/2010 7:21:15 AM PST by dusttoyou (libs are all wee wee'd up and no place to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck
For several years now, Airbus has offered its customers a special safety program - called "Buss" -- at a cost of €300,000 per aircraft. If the airspeed indicator fails, this software shows pilots the angle at which they must point the plane.

Reminds me of Microsoft making money from its defective products.

Great article. With the info they have, they really don't need to find the black boxes.

6 posted on 02/27/2010 7:37:47 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Maybe the rate of ice formation was so high that the pitot heat couldn’t keep up.


7 posted on 02/27/2010 7:40:55 AM PST by poindexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: poindexter

Correct.


8 posted on 02/27/2010 7:43:45 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck

>>It would be easier for pilots if they could simply switch the computer off in critical situations, as is possible on Boeing planes.<<

That’s why, as the saying goes, “If it ain’t Boeing, I ain’t going”

Tragic loss. Tragic.


9 posted on 02/27/2010 7:44:51 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Reminds me of back in the day flying partial panel and being every so thankful for the AOA!!

I liked this article because it seems plausable given the known facts and the author seemed to have stuck to the facts.

BTW enjoy you link to Caddyshack Quotes!! That was one of our deployment classics many years ago.

10 posted on 02/27/2010 7:50:20 AM PST by lowbuck (The Blue Card (American passport): Don't leave home without it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck
Seems to me pitot tubes are antiquated nowadays, with GPS, Doppler, and all the weather information we have.

Sure, estimated airspeed from GPS and weather data would not be as good as pitot tube data, but, it would be better than no data at all.

Plus, couldn't they have some kind of ultrasonic or radar Dopper system to tell them the airspeed?

Something a little more robust than 1909 pitot tube technology?

On a 320?

11 posted on 02/27/2010 7:53:15 AM PST by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caddie

“Seems to me pitot tubes are antiquated nowadays, with GPS, Doppler, and all the weather information we have.”

Pitot tubes tell the pressure of the air over the wings, which is all that matters.


12 posted on 02/27/2010 8:21:29 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck
More than 200 tons of metal, plastic, kerosene and human bodies smashed into the sea. The sheer force of the impact is described in the forensic report, which lists in graphic detail how lungs were torn apart and bones were shredded end to end. Some of the passengers were sliced in half by their seatbelt.

...shows that the plane did not plunge vertically into the sea, but rather hit the water like a flat hand, with the nose of the aircraft pointing upwards at a five-degree angle ... it can be deduced that the A330 was brought to a halt with a force more than 36 times that of normal gravity: 36g.

13 posted on 02/27/2010 8:22:09 AM PST by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caddie

Pitot tubes work when your electrical system has failed.


14 posted on 02/27/2010 8:23:12 AM PST by Magnum44 (Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior firepower is the cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MCH
Flat Spin, What you would expect with the loss of the vertical stabilizerA La Rockaway crash ...
15 posted on 02/27/2010 8:40:19 AM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck

Well written article. Thank you.


16 posted on 02/27/2010 9:39:48 AM PST by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck
Excellent article -- thanks! Until now I had reserved judgment regarding Airbus' craft, but now I am less than happy with them and their flight computers.
According to this scenario, the pilots would have been forced to watch helplessly as their plane lost its lift. That theory is supported by the fact that the airplane remained intact to the very end. Given all the turbulence, it is therefore possible that the passengers remained oblivious to what was happening. After all, the oxygen masks that have been recovered had not dropped down from the ceiling because of a loss of pressure. What's more, the stewardesses weren't sitting on their emergency seats, and the lifejackets remained untouched. "There is no evidence whatsoever that the passengers in the cabin had been prepared for an emergency landing," says BEA boss Jean-Paul Troadec.

17 posted on 02/27/2010 10:11:16 AM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
''For several years now, Airbus has offered its customers a special safety program - called "Buss" -- at a cost of €300,000 per aircraft. If the airspeed indicator fails, this software shows pilots the angle at which they must point the plane.''

Grrrr! *\:^(

18 posted on 02/27/2010 10:16:44 AM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
It would seem that the pilots and the plane were doomed from the start of the cascading events.

I don't have the Airbus tables, but when you are high and heavy (and possibly encounter non standard temperature conditions) the margin of error between a safe flight envelope and a stalled condition becomes very small.

Add to that the darkness, turbulence and then one after one all of your automated devices deciding to vote “non” and taking a powder these pilots were really in the hurt locker.

If you look at my profile you can see that I flew for one of Uncle Sam's non profit airlines. On several occasions I have had a nightmare that I was flying and no matter what I did the plane was still “going in”. I suspect that the pilots on AF did all that they could do but lived a real nightmare.

19 posted on 02/27/2010 10:26:21 AM PST by lowbuck (The Blue Card (American passport): Don't leave home without it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck

The pitot tube kvetching entirely misses the point: the Airbus has no manual controls and its computers kept shutting themselves down.

Yes, they may have shut themselves off because of the conflicting pitot tube data, but there was no other way to fly that Airbus other than via computer.

All that the pilots could do was restart (reboot) the flight computers, which they did, twice.

The Airbus was only flying at 95mph...it was at overload condition at take-off...it stalled, flat-spun, and crashed horizontally.

Perhaps a total fly-by-wire system isn’t so clever (Toyota, anyone??).


20 posted on 02/27/2010 10:32:21 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson