Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Academy Women to Become First Female Submariners (stupid idea)
American Forces Press Service ^ | Lisa Daniel

Posted on 02/26/2010 4:44:12 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Feb. 26, 2010 – Female sailors will begin serving on submarines by the end of next year, with Naval Academy graduates leading the way, Navy leaders told a Senate committee yesterday.

Navy Secretary Ray Mabus told the Senate Armed Services Committee that the Navy is in a good position to move forward with integrating women onto submarines.

“We think we learned a lot about integrating women in the services years ago, and those lessons are relevant today,” Mabus said. Those lessons, he said, include having a “critical mass” of female candidates, having senior women to serve as mentors, and having submarines that don’t require modifications: the SSBN ballistic missile and SSGN guided-missile subs.

Finally, Mabus said, “We have the lesson learned to make sure any questions are answered, … and we’re very open and transparent on how we’ll do this. We think this is a great idea that will enhance our warfighting capabilities.”

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates notified Congress on Feb. 19 of the intended change to Navy policy. Mabus had pushed for the change since taking office in May. Adm. Gary Roughead, chief of naval operations, endorsed the change, saying in a statement released in September that his experience commanding a mixed-gender surface-combatant ship makes him “very comfortable” integrating women into the submarine force. The Navy changed its policy to allow women to serve on combatant ships in 1993.

“We have a great plan, and we’re ready to go for the first women to come aboard in late 2011,” Roughead told the Senate committee yesterday. In a prepared statement to the committee, he said the change would enable the submarine force “to leverage the tremendous talent and potential of our female officers and enlisted personnel.”

Besides the incoming officers from the academy, the first women submariners will include female supply corps officers at the department head level, Roughead said. The change will be phased in over time to include enlisted female sailors on the SSBN and SSGNs, he said. Women will be added to the Navy’s SSN fast-attack submarines after necessary modifications can be determined, he said.

“This initiative has my personal attention, and I will continue to keep you informed as we integrate these highly motivated and capable officers into our submarine force,” Roughead told the committee.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: bhodod; bhosecdef; submarines; submatines; usna; usnavy; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 401-410 next last
To: LuvFreeRepublic
I haven't seen any demeaning of women on this thread. I have seen supersensitive idiot females wrongly interpret what has been said here as demeaning to women.

Nowhere in my post did I say that men "dont realize it" when they demean women. I said that real women know the ways they affect men in ways that men don't even recognize half the time. Your good Pop failed you in that respect, apparently. Here's the deal: women, once they reach puberty, affect men profoundly and a lot of the times, men aren't fully aware of how they're affected, but a real woman is and she respects that "power," if you want to call it that, that she has over him and doesn't takes advantage of it unless she has to (!); men are in their way uniquely and extremely vulnerable when it comes to females.

A girl, a silly female, an idiot woman, 1) fails to understand the hold she has over men by virtue of being female and 2) expects to be treated as their equal. She expects to be respected by men when she herself treats them with disrespect.

I'm not going to insult your dad, the real man who raised you. I insult YOU and say that your understanding of "real men" is piss-poor BECAUSE obviously you think you're being "demeaned" by men when you're not. Now me, I'm demeaning you because you're insulting a WHOLE lotta Real Men FReepers by accusing them of demeaning and insulting women, when all my years here, I have RARELY seen that happen. You need to get your head screwed on right, start tuning in more closely to the real man who raised you, and start tuning out American pop culture that has you thinking men and women are equal. They never have been and never will be, THANK GOD.

321 posted on 02/27/2010 10:42:35 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic; IrishCatholic; mylife
LFR sniffs: "FYI, there is nothing prejudicial about my desire to see people treat each other with respect."

LFR, putting women on submarines IS treating people with disrespect -- namely, men and the warrior culture. Putting women in combat situations IS treating people, men who are trying to do the job of fighting in combat, with disrespect (see mylife's posts, in particular #302 above).

GET A CLUE, stop whining like a pissy female that this is somehow "demeaning" to women, and start showing TRUE respect for other people. So far, you are the one indicating that you endorse DISRESPECT and (typical of a woman!) insist on calling it a form of respect. Yeeeeeesh.

322 posted on 02/27/2010 10:55:22 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Amen. I've known of the same in work situations (not the military) where guys working together accomplished things and met deadlines (and budgets) that they'd been told were impossible; it won them an Emmy, in fact! Had women been in the mix, there's not a snowball's chance in hell those women, even the best of them, wouldn't have innocently or maliciously screwed up the dynamics. Smart women know when to leave men to themselves. Smart women know that if women ruled the world, we'd still be living in caves.
323 posted on 02/27/2010 11:01:30 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Finny

LOL, nice try.


324 posted on 02/27/2010 11:10:27 AM PST by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

I would guess you would get called up for calling someone who hogs the shower a “water buffalo”...i’m glad i did my time on subs years ago...it was hard enough just dealing with moody guys...i can’t imagine the drama this will cause...i shudder just thinking about it.


325 posted on 02/27/2010 11:20:58 AM PST by chasio649 (37-21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic
From your myspace:
I am smart, compassionate, strong, capable, vulnerable, caring, grumpy, passionate, fierce, happy, content, frustrated, opinionated, quite, loving, secure, inquisitive, bored, excited, hopeful, …etc. Gosh am I complex? No, but simply stated, I am human and I am alive. ; ;

You don't mention "married" or not.

326 posted on 02/27/2010 12:07:21 PM PST by b9 (Hi Mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: b9

Divorced. It is on the left side.


327 posted on 02/27/2010 12:13:35 PM PST by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic

Hope love can heal your anger some day.


328 posted on 02/27/2010 12:16:57 PM PST by b9 (Hi Mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: b9

I was wondering what your punch line was going to be. FYI, I have lots of love in my life.


329 posted on 02/27/2010 12:18:40 PM PST by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic

Hope you find more.


330 posted on 02/27/2010 12:23:23 PM PST by b9 (Hi Mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Finny,

Thank you for this excellent post.


331 posted on 02/27/2010 12:31:15 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

Comment #332 Removed by Moderator

Comment #333 Removed by Moderator

To: central_va; ansel12; Jersey Republican Biker Chick

You guys are just proving her point.


334 posted on 02/27/2010 1:23:29 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: metmom
You guys are just proving her point.

And what point is that?

335 posted on 02/27/2010 1:28:48 PM PST by central_va ( http://www.15thvirginia.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: GrannyAnn; Jersey Republican Biker Chick
Hypersensitive, overly emotional and intellectually inferior women have no business being around men in any capacity whatsoever.

Then why are you here?

336 posted on 02/27/2010 1:39:31 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

No problem.Submariner family. This is nuts, and one more chink in our readiness that doesn’t need to happen except to achieve political fairness for some academy female grad looking to punch a ticket. The problem here is that the whole ship is the weapon. There is not backup for failure— usually in combat it would mean complete destruction of the vessel and all crew. No room for “touchy touchy” in any sense, fem-fem (love type) or male-male (love type) or the even more destructive/protective female-male (love type). Like your tag in Latin it is “Primum Non Nocere”


337 posted on 02/27/2010 1:39:53 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: central_va; Jersey Republican Biker Chick

That....”FR used to be a decent site, now it is filled with name calling, woman bashing, and outright disrespect.”

Your comment in post 115 is a perfect example of what she was referring to.


338 posted on 02/27/2010 1:45:54 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

You will never convince people of something they don’t want to be convinced of.

Your comments are clear and there is no reason to misrepresent them like that.

Shake the dust off your feet....


339 posted on 02/27/2010 1:48:09 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Finny
I think you have a good grasp of reality.
Putting women fast attack subs would defiantly change the dynamic of the crew and IMO weaken mission readiness.

I think women should be able to serve in the military but not on the front lines under pressure with the men.

Many women already work on sub tenders. They do a great job, but I know that the world on a sub tender and that on a sub are galaxy's apart.

We just don't operate like the surface navy.

Next thing ya know there will be mixed SEAL teams

340 posted on 02/27/2010 1:48:19 PM PST by mylife (Opinions: $1.00 Halfbaked: 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 401-410 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson