Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend
The New York Times ^ | January 26, 1989 | PHILIP SHABECOFF

Posted on 02/26/2010 8:49:16 AM PST by justlittleoleme

WASHINGTON, Jan. 25— After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in average temperatures or rainfall in the United States over that entire period.

While the nation's weather in individual years or even for periods of years has been hotter or cooler and drier or wetter than in other periods, the new study shows that over the last century there has been no trend in one direction or another.

The study, made by scientists for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was published in the current issue of Geophysical Research Letters. It is based on temperature and precipitation readings taken at weather stations around the country from 1895 to 1987.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: climatechange; global; globalwarming; gorebullwarming; goresbullcrap; illegitimateliar; kenyanvillageidiot; scam; warming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: lstanle

That means all the warming was in 1989-1995 :-)


41 posted on 02/26/2010 11:59:27 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (IN A SMALL TENT WE JUST STAND CLOSER! * IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme
That article is from 1989
42 posted on 02/26/2010 12:43:06 PM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca; justlittleoleme
1989?

Yep.

1989.

Back then, you were not burned alive at the Politically Correct stake as a heretic for publishing such a study.

It would be interesting to do a comparison between the data published in the Pre-Climate-Hysteria era and the data published in the Full-Blown-Climate-Hysteria Era

43 posted on 02/26/2010 1:30:07 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

bump for truth


44 posted on 02/26/2010 2:59:48 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 43... 42... 41...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme
The key here to note, is the date -- 1989.

The very next year, 1990, the NOAA "began systematically eliminating climate measuring stations in cooler locations around the world. Yes, that's right. They began eliminating stations that tended to record cooler temperatures and drove up the average measured temperature. The eliminated stations had been in higher latitudes and altitudes, inland areas away from the sea, as well as more rural locations. The drop in the number of weather stations was dramatic, declining from more than 6,000 stations to fewer than 1,500."

Now somebody remind me who was President and in charge of the NOAA in 1990. Anybody? Bueller? Yes Ferris, it was New World Order blue-blood country clubber George "Big Daddy" Bush.

Now why would the Republicans want to set the stage for global warming science and Cap and Trade?

Nah, I don't believe in Conspiracy Theories. /sarc

And people think the powers that be behind the Democrats are all that different from the PTB behind the blue-blood country club Republicans.

45 posted on 02/26/2010 3:10:46 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 43... 42... 41...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

Sorry, I forgot the link to the FOX news story about the NOAA cherry picking the hottest climate data. See below:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/02/09/john-lott-joseph-daleo-climate-change-noaa-james-hansen/


46 posted on 02/26/2010 3:11:25 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 43... 42... 41...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

“Update, that article is from 1989, up to then. So any warming must be viewed from 1989 to now, correct?

Unless you remember the words of Phil Jones when, a couple of weeks ago, he admitted that there has been no “statistical warming” over the last 15 years.


47 posted on 02/26/2010 4:57:13 PM PST by Texaspeptoman (Even cannibals get fed-up with people sometimes...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
It's in the title info...Related thread:

The big picture: 65 million years of temperature swings

48 posted on 02/26/2010 11:36:06 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Update, that article is from 1989, up to then. So any warming must be viewed from 1989 to now, correct?

Probably not. I'll get back to you soon.

49 posted on 03/02/2010 10:25:58 PM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson