[bamahead]

5. Users should not expect that files stored on District resources will be private.

Advises that files the student *knowingly* stores on district machines are subject to review.

Did the student *knowingly* capture a photograph of himself eating candy and store it on the laptop? All signs point to NO.

Those statements are useless on the merits of this case. Where is the stipulation that the camera can be activated at any time by school officials, including inside of the student's private residence?

Your arguement is very, very, very thin. And transparent as an educrat who thinks they are above the law.

[Dead Corpse]

All signs point to NO.

You mean the news stories based on the plaintiffs lawsuit? Those signs?

Well... shoot. Why bother having a trial and an investigation then? We'll just start stringing all of 'em up from the nearest lamppost... Who should we start with in your opinion? The Superintendent or the District IT Director?

Calling me an "educrat" is as stupid as calling Gandhi a war-monger.