To: bamahead
The school issued the laptop under false pretenses.Will this do?
4. Network security is designed to allow access to certain areas only by designated users; however, the network administrator may review files and communications to maintain system integrity and ensure that students are using the system responsibly.
5. Users should not expect that files stored on District resources will be private.
Stipulates no expectation of data privacy.
"Beware Greeks bearing gifts."
Wisdom as old as the ages.
170 posted on
03/18/2010 7:25:18 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: Dead Corpse
I see absolutely nothing in that document referring to invoking photgrapic capture capability within a student’s place of residence.
You are reaching.
171 posted on
03/18/2010 7:35:02 AM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: Dead Corpse
5. Users should not expect that files stored on District resources will be private.
Advises that files the student *knowingly* stores on district machines are subject to review.
Did the student *knowingly* capture a photograph of himself eating candy and store it on the laptop? All signs point to NO.
Those statements are useless on the merits of this case. Where is the stipulation that the camera can be activated at any time by school officials, including inside of the student's private residence?
Your arguement is very, very, very thin. And transparent as an educrat who thinks they are above the law.
172 posted on
03/18/2010 7:42:49 AM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: Dead Corpse; bamahead
It only says *access files*.
It does not stipulate activating the webcam to monitor student behavior or activity.
177 posted on
03/18/2010 9:21:02 AM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson