Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse; metmom; driftdiver
If you're truly a libertarian, you'll agree with us. This case should be a slam-dunk for the plaintiffs.

(1) The school district requires every student to take a school laptop. They aren't permitted to use any other laptop for their classes.

(2) The students are required to carry their laptops from class to class.

(3) Each student is required to pay an insurance fee for his or her laptop. If he fails to pay the insurance fee, he cannot take the laptop off-campus. However, the insurance fee is waived for lower-income students.

(4) School administrators admitted they never informed students or parents that the school could activate the webcams remotely to look in on the students at home.

My husband works in IT, and he said the IT people at the school should've known they could NEVER do something like this. This security consultant explains more.

139 posted on 03/13/2010 11:08:22 PM PST by Tired of Taxes (Dad, I will always think of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: Tired of Taxes
Does the school REQUIRE them to use them in the bathroom? Their bedroom?

Were the Students told to leave the iSight uncovered and that LoJack was installed?

141 posted on 03/14/2010 7:46:30 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

To: Tired of Taxes

The school requires the kids to use only that computer for school work which they know means the kids are going to be taking the computers home.

They prohibit the webcams from being covered up.

They turned on the webcam on this kid’s computer not under conditions which they themselves specified, ie. the report of a lost or stolen computer.

They chastise the boy for “inappropriate behavior” in his own room, which they illegally observed and recorded.

Nobody FORCED the school to turn on the webcam of a computer not reported lost of stolen. Nobody forced them to record what they saw. Nobody forced the VP to chastise the boy for what they inappropriately saw in the privacy of his own room or house.

And somehow it’s everybody’s fault but the school distict’s because the parents/kids/maid/gardener/whoever, wasn’t doing the job of policing the child’s use of the computer at home conscientiously enough.


143 posted on 03/14/2010 10:36:30 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson