Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand
Suing the attacker's estate would be the normal and proper course. But, it's clear that won't bear fruit, so the blood-suckers pick another victim.

They sued the estate.

305 posted on 02/24/2010 8:34:43 PM PST by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: ColdWater
"They sued the estate."

They may have sued the estate, also. But, you can't find someone responsible of negligence without naming them in the suit as well. I haven't seen a copy of the suit, but it's highly unusual that a perpetrator's family member (in this case spouse) be sued, especially when they aren't named by LE as an accomplice to the crime.

Like I said, the perpetrator's estate is going to bear no fruit. The only chance the victim's attorney's have at a jury award is to sue the family. It's despicable, and it's not reflective of a well-functioning tort system.

333 posted on 02/24/2010 9:04:24 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson