To: mylife
Nor can I. I base that on the delusional idea that the law is just and moral.According to some one this thread, the pilot's wife is an innocent victim. Is not the moral and just thing for the insurance to pay this 'innocent victim'? To deny payment to an 'innocent victim' would be NOT moral.
286 posted on
02/24/2010 8:12:09 PM PST by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: ColdWater
The person whose life was "insured" is the deceased killer. Now, if the Stack widow were to die, naturally, and had life insurance, you'd probably take that money from her young orphan and hand it over to the IRS widow.
Talk about lack of mercy..................
289 posted on
02/24/2010 8:14:55 PM PST by
Thumper1960
(A modern so-called "Conservative" is a shadow of a wisp of a vertebrate human being.)
To: ColdWater
I see that rule as a deterrent to bad behavior.
Seems like a simple law, that would prevent abuse.
But who knows what Joe Stack was thinking? The man was flat out crazy.
How do you write laws against crazy?
291 posted on
02/24/2010 8:17:21 PM PST by
mylife
(Opinions: $1.00 Halfbaked: 50c)
To: ColdWater
According to some one this thread, the pilot's wife is an innocent victim. In all criminal cases, you are innocent until proven guilty, and so far I have not seen any indication that she was a co-conspirator and profited in any way from this crime.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson