No No No....
We have ALL been talking about this since last year. This is no surprise.
But Pamela Geller was the only one who had the definitive documents from the classroom and the parent willing to give out his name. He used HER documents, delivered snail mail to her ON HIS SHOW. Without attribution. I don’t give a shit if he was talking about it since 1964, chief, but the fact of the matter is that someone else had the story, the proof, and the graphics and he claimed it for himself. That doesn’t bother you?
You can’t be serious. He presented the story, the proof and graphics as his own. Really, you’re okay with that?
Until today I've never even heard of Pamela Geller and was fully aware of everything in the link you sent.
If we all had to cite sources for everything we utter we'd never get anything said.
It does a lot of harm to our cause when we bash those who are getting out truths that no one else is, and Gelnn is doing that. Maybe you already know the history but many do not.
This particular political climate has aroused a lot of interest in people who would normally be agnostic. How many lurkers do you think might come here, newly exposed to people like Glenn or Rush to see what people who are avid followers have to say about them?
WE need to attract all we can and not turn them off to people like Glenn, he's getting a lot of information out that needs to be heard.
Hell if we're bashing them they'll tune them out, it does a great disservice to our cause.
Disagreeing and having discussions about it are what this forum is for, eating our own for whatever inane reason is why we are known for snatching defeat from the jaw of victory.