Until today I've never even heard of Pamela Geller and was fully aware of everything in the link you sent.
If we all had to cite sources for everything we utter we'd never get anything said.
It does a lot of harm to our cause when we bash those who are getting out truths that no one else is, and Gelnn is doing that. Maybe you already know the history but many do not.
This particular political climate has aroused a lot of interest in people who would normally be agnostic. How many lurkers do you think might come here, newly exposed to people like Glenn or Rush to see what people who are avid followers have to say about them?
WE need to attract all we can and not turn them off to people like Glenn, he's getting a lot of information out that needs to be heard.
Hell if we're bashing them they'll tune them out, it does a great disservice to our cause.
Disagreeing and having discussions about it are what this forum is for, eating our own for whatever inane reason is why we are known for snatching defeat from the jaw of victory.
Good post...The theory that bothers me most is who is next? It may be beck now but could be most anyone that steps into the limelight next.
Pamela Geller is an amazing conservative. Awesome, in fact.