[eyeamok]

Any person or persons who has in their employ or employed on their behalf for the purpose of providing Protection or Security with a Firearm of any kind ,Shall be Guilty of a Class A Felony, punishable by a Mandatory Sentence of 25 years in State Prison and COMPLETE CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE.

This will fix the problem overnight. Why should We The People allow Hired Guns to protect the Elite that can afford them?? Unless ALL PERSONS have the same right to Self Defense, then Nobody does. That’s Equal Protection Under The LAW

[imjimbo]

Make that include elected people and you’ve got a deal-!!

[eyeamok]

Any person or persons who has in their employ or employed on their behalf for the purpose of providing Protection or Security with a Firearm of any kind ,Shall be Guilty of a Class A Felony, punishable by a Mandatory Sentence of 25 years in State Prison and COMPLETE CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE.
There Shall be NO EXCEPTIONS, EXCLUSIONS or IMMUNITIES FOR ANY PERSON, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, EVER.

There fixed it.

[PapaBear3625]

Any person or persons who has in their employ or employed on their behalf for the purpose of providing Protection or Security with a Firearm of any kind ,Shall be Guilty of a Class A Felony, punishable by a Mandatory Sentence of 25 years in State Prison and COMPLETE CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE.

That's kind of extreme. How about:

No person providing protective services shall have any more right to own or carry a firearm than any other private citizen. Police officers, off-duty, shall have no more rights to carry firearms than any other private citizen.

[Joe 6-pack]

"Any person or persons who has in their employ or employed on their behalf for the purpose of providing Protection or Security with a Firearm of any kind ,Shall be Guilty of a Class A Felony, punishable by a Mandatory Sentence of 25 years in State Prison and COMPLETE CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE."

So a person with property or family members in several cities or states can't hire people to look after them on his behalf?