Posted on 02/22/2010 4:34:40 AM PST by SJackson
Jerusalem, February 22, 2010 - A section of an ancient city wall of Jerusalem from the tenth century B.C.E. - possibly built by King Solomon -- has been revealed in archaeological excavations directed by Dr. Eilat Mazar and conducted under the auspices of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
The section of the city wall revealed, 70 meters long and six meters high, is located in the area known as the Ophel, between the City of David and the southern wall of the Temple Mount.
Uncovered in the city wall complex are: an inner gatehouse for access into the royal quarter of the city, a royal structure adjacent to the gatehouse, and a corner tower that overlooks a substantial section of the adjacent Kidron valley.
The excavations in the Ophel area were carried out over a three-month period with funding provided by Daniel Mintz and Meredith Berkman, a New York couple interested in Biblical Archeology. The funding supports both completion of the archaeological excavations and processing and analysis of the finds as well as conservation work and preparation of the site for viewing by the public within the Ophel Archaeological Park and the national park around the walls of Jerusalem.
The excavations were carried out in cooperation with the Israel Antiquities Authority, the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, and the Company for the Development of East Jerusalem. Archaeology students from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem as well as volunteer students from the Herbert W. Armstrong College in Edmond, Oklahoma, and hired workers all participated in the excavation work.
"The city wall that has been uncovered testifies to a ruling presence. Its strength and form of construction indicate a high level of engineering", Mazar said. The city wall is at the eastern end of the Ophel area in a high, strategic location atop the western slop of the Kidron valley.
"A comparison of this latest finding with city walls and gates from the period of the First Temple, as well as pottery found at the site, enable us to postulate with a great degree of assurance that the wall that has been revealed is that which was built by King Solomon in Jerusalem in the latter part of the tenth century B.C.E.," said Mazar
"This is the first time that a structure from that time has been found that may correlate with written descriptions of Solomon's building in Jerusalem," she added. "The Bible tells us that Solomon built -- with the assistance of the Phoenicians, who were outstanding builders -- the Temple and his new palace and surrounded them with a city, most probably connected to the more ancient wall of the City of David." Mazar specifically cites the third chapter of the First Books of Kings where it refers to "until he (Solomon) had made an end of building his own house, and the house of the Lord, and the wall of Jerusalem round about."
The six-meter-high gatehouse of the uncovered city wall complex is built in a style typical of those from the period of the First Temple like Megiddo, Beersheva and Ashdod. It has symmetrical plan of four identical small rooms, two on each side of the main passageway. Also there was a large, adjacent tower, covering an area of 24 by 18 meters, which was intended to serve as a watchtower to protect entry to the city. The tower is located today under the nearby road and still needs to be excavated. Nineteenth century British surveyor Charles Warren, who conducted an underground survey in the area, first described the outline of the large tower in 1867 but without attributing it to the era of Solomon.
"Part of the city wall complex served as commercial space and part as security stations," explained Mazar. Within the courtyard of the large tower there were widespread public activities, she said. It served as a public meeting ground, as a place for conducting commercial activities and cult activities, and as a location for economic and legal activities.
Pottery shards discovered within the fill of the lowest floor of the royal building near the gatehouse also testify to the dating of the complex to the 10th century B.C.E. Found on the floor were remnants of large storage jars, 1.15 meters in height, that survived destruction by fire and that were found in rooms that apparently served as storage areas on the ground floor of the building. On one of the jars there is a partial inscription in ancient Hebrew indicating it belonged to a high-level government official.
"The jars that were found are the largest ever found in Jerusalem," said Mazar, adding that "the inscription that was found on one of them shows that it belonged to a government official, apparently the person responsible for overseeing the provision of baked goods to the royal court."
In addition to the pottery shards, cult figurines were also found in the area, as were seal impressions on jar handles with the word "to the king," testifying to their usage within the monarchy. Also found were seal impressions (bullae) with Hebrew names, also indicating the royal nature of the structure. Most of the tiny fragments uncovered came from intricate wet sifting done with the help of the salvaging Temple Mount Sifting Project, directed by Dr. Gabriel Barkai and Zachi Zweig, under the auspice of the Nature and Parks Authority and the Ir David Foundation.
Between the large tower at the city gate and the royal building the archaeologists uncovered a section of the corner tower that is eight meters in length and six meters high. The tower was built of carved stones of unusual beauty.
East of the royal building, another section of the city wall that extends for some 35 meters also was revealed. This section is five meters high, and is part of the wall that continues to the northeast and once enclosed the Ophel area.
Photos available via e-mail upon request and at the following link: http://bit.ly/cRvAeH
For further information: Jerry Barach, Dept. of Media Relations, the Hebrew University, Tel: 02-588-2904. Orit Sulitzeanu, Hebrew University spokesperson, Tel: 054-8820016.
You are an idiot...I don’t hate Jews, on the contrary. But, you are still an idiot and a fear monger...or are you just paranoid.
You still cannot show me where the term BCE began, did it begin with Jews trying to take the Christ out of the dates from his life?
So, what is your answer big shot. So far, you have just shown yourself to be a fool, want to continue?
You’re a fool.
Sorry, CH, not all Christians are idiots. Please accept my apology on behalf of Christiandom.
Isn’t BCE just an academic way of saying Before the Christian Era?
I have no idea where the term began. It is, however, the term that Jews use to describe the “secular” calender that everyone uses. This article was from a Hebrew University website. Hebrew University is a Jewish institution. Ergo, Hebrew University is not going to identify any date as being “Before Christ,” because Hebrew University does not acknowledge that “Christ” (i.e. the Messiah) has ever come. Similarly, Hebrew University will not identify any date as “A.D.” (Anno Domini = In the Year of Our Lord), because Jesus is not, and never will be, “Our Lord.”
I don’t really feel insulted by the Jews not using the term, as you say, most of them (not all however) do not recognize yet that Jesus Christ is the Lord. Someday, you will though :)
It is still strange for the Jewish scholars to not recognize the terms however, the date range is the same...it is rather rude...don’t you think?
I wonder how you would feel if the insult were reversed...
Of course not all Christians are idiots, but you certainly are. Go slther back under the rock you crawled out from and hide in shame.
The term means Before the Common Era. It is a term, which is used solely for the purpose of removing Jesus Christ from the date ranges which are basically from his birth/death. In other words, they use the same dates...just take the meaningful part of why we use those dates out.
Maybe someone can explain what “common era” means? Common with what?
I think it is just a way to assuage the sensibilities of other religions and a euphemism for Before the Christian Era.
It’s not “rude.” It is, however, extremely rude for you to demand that any Jew, especially a Jewish scholar, define any year as being “Before Christ,” when no “Christ” has come. It’s no insult, unless you are insulted by us uppity Jews not toeing the line and converting. In which case, you can, once again, copulate with yourself. We ain’t going anywhere.
Here is Wpin Freepmail to me:
“Hey Third Ruffian,
F[redacted]k you. I do not abide rude behavior...”
Some impressive Christian he is.
I can practically feel the love of God radiating from him.
Wpin:
You’re an embarrasment to Christianity Wpin. You are silly, uninformed, and a disgrace.
Why don’t we meet and talk about it?
Of course it is rude, and it is dishonest. The facts are that the date ranges are the same...whether you understand that Jesus Christ is God or not is irrelevant at that point...the dates reflect his birth/death. It is an insult to try to steal that from people.
I had the honor of witnessing an afternoon prayer by Orthodox Jews. It was an amazing event, the history of this prayer service going back thousands of years and still being conducted to this day in the same manner with same words (I presume anyway) was incredibly moving. Now, I do not worship the same way...afternoon prayers...nor do any Christians I know of...not in the same way. But, it would be an incredible insult and rude to change the name of what you call it for something non-Jewish say. I know these are somewhat apples to oranges, but there are similarities.
In any event, I am really tiring of this thread. I have been subjected to rudeness and name calling, of course by people who would not have the courage to say these things to my face. So, I will bid you adieu and good luck.
Sure. I live in Hobbes, NM. Come on by.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.