Beck understands the diagnosis but not the treatment. I actually agree with most of what Beck is saying. I find much of his program to be informative and provocative. But he needs to stick with the history lessons. It does seem rather curious that although Beck is a talented guy, he is the only one of his kind that fails to see any substantial difference between the Dims and Republicans. This glaring failure to comprehend this obvious fact is reducing his credibility. Strategy is not his forte and this is exactly where he can be counterproductive to the conservative movement.
The Republicans are sick, heal them. The Democrats are just another incarnation in the long line of tyrants. Like the zombies or the living dead, they must constantly be destroyed with every generation.
Let Beck conduct the examination. but do not give him the scalpel. That calls for steadier and more experienced hands.
Partial agreement here.
It does seem rather curious that although Beck is a talented guy, he is the only one of his kind that fails to see any substantial difference between the Dims and Republicans.
When you consider that when Beck exposed self-confessed Marxists and Communists among Obama's senior staff, one should not have had to imagine that the Republicans would have been outraged. I heard crickets, I heard cowering and boot-licking among the Republicans. The sad, sick fact of the matter is that the Republicans are cowards, without a single spine among them.
They, as a whole, are boot-lickers - appologizing for not 'reaching out' to the Democrats either fast enough, nor hard enough. They are collectively nothing more than a fellating group of sissies, whom eagerly line up to give the Democrats whatever they want, whenever they want, and however they want.
So, when you have one group actively trying to destroy the country, and the Republicans making no attempts to call attention to what is going on - what is the difference between the two? Seriously, what is the difference?
Let's look at Illegal Immigration, this is pretty much a binary choice. You are either for it, or against it. The polls show that an overwhelming majority of Americans want the borders sealed. We are at war, we have parsites committing crimes, stealing, killing and taking jobs. Where were the Repubicans when they had the chance to seal the border? They were servicing the Democrats.
How about Healtcare? Why, the public says "Hell no" and the Republicans spit the Democrat's out of their mouth just long enough to say "Why, we have a plan of our own" - when a vast majority of the population simply wants to be left alone. What is the difference between the parties, except lip-service and moving speeches?
Ann Coutier had it dead-on when she said that the ONLY reason we cannot buy Health Insurance across state lines is because Congress got involved. My life insurance, home insurance, and car insurance all follow me across the states in which I have lived. The only insurance I cannot buy in Utah, are the policies I had in Texas. Why? Whom does this benefit? How many Republicans voted for this, because a Lobbyist took him on a nice vacation? Where was the Conservative outrage that challenged this law? You can't talk with your mouth full.
I challenge you to name ONE, just ONE case where the Republicans have stood up as one and said "You shall go no further". Chances are, you can't. War on Terrorism? Nope. Gays in the Military? Nope? Flag burning? Nope. Tax reduction? Nope. Gov't expansion? Nope. Decreased taxes? Nope. Elimination in fraud on how our tax dollars are embezzeled? Nope. Rooting out corruption in Congress? Nope.
Where do Republicans differ in action, not in rhetoric? They say one thing when they run for election; but perform the exact opposite when finally elected. Wanna example? Watch what happens when the Dems try to push Healthcare through again.