Not a perfect fit for Beck by any means [I still have a soft spot for the guy] but here is food for thought:
Discources:
CHAPTER XLI.: it is imprudent and unprofitable suddenly to change from humility to pride, and from gentleness to cruelty.
Besides the other errors committed by Appius in attempting to maintain his tyranny, that of changing too suddenly from one quality to the extreme opposite was of no little moment. Although his astuteness in deceiving the people by simulating to be of their party was well employed, and equally so the means he used to bring about the reappointment of the Ten, as well as his audacity in nominating himself, contrary to the expectations of the nobles, and in naming colleagues to suit his own purposes; yet it was very ill-judged in him suddenly to change his character, and from having been a friend of the people, all at once to show himself their enemy, — from being humane to become haughty, and from being easy of access to become difficult, — and to do this so suddenly and without excuse that everybody could see the falseness of his soul. For he who for a time has seemed good, and for purposes of his own wants to become bad, should do it gradually, and should seem to be brought to it by the force of circumstances; so that, before his changed nature deprives him of his former friends, he may have gained new ones, and that his authority may not be diminished by the change. Otherwise his deception will be discovered, and he will lose his friends and be ruined.
Get my viewers on my side - since I’m on their side - and since I’ve been right all along then....Mitt! Wouldn’t surprise me at all - if his (subtle) propaganda works on his viewers - that includes 3rd party.
- - - - - - - -
Yep. And I guarantee NO MATTER WHAT Beck will NOT speak out against Mitt. They are both LDS and that is a very strong bond, esp since Mitt is LDS aristocracy and Beck is a ‘lowly convert’.