Posted on 02/21/2010 10:59:34 AM PST by wagglebee
A disagreement is taking place in an Edmonton hospital that has national implications and has not received the media coverage that it deserves. What has been reported is information that misdirects the public from the fundamental issues.
I refer to the case of Baby Isaiah, whose fate has yet to be determined. He was disabled at birth due to lack of oxygen during his delivery and remains in the hospital, breathing with the help of a mechanical ventilator and occasionally taking unassisted breaths. His parents, devastated, remained cautiously optimistic until they received a letter dated Jan. 13, 2010, informing them that withdrawal of active treatment was medically reasonable, ethically responsible and appropriate. The letter further asserts that it would be in Isaiah's best interest to discontinue support and, with sadness, such support would cease on Jan. 20, 2010.
To date, the issue is unresolved and Isaiah remains on a ventilator.
As a physician, I specialize in the management of the weak and disabled. My task is clear: restore an individual's health if I am able, and protect my patient's rights as a human being. I must state categorically that I am not a vitalist. Patients may choose to decline my treatment and as a consequence, die. I will support this choice but need not enable it. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba, my regulating body and proclaimed public defender, has a statement on end-of-life care available on its website: http://www.cpsm.mb.ca/statements/st1602.pdf. It attempts to address the disagreements between physicians and patients or their identified decision-makers by following a protocol.
The statement empowers physicians in Manitoba to involuntarily withdraw care but they must provide a 96-hour window during which a patient may seek a legal injunction.
Stated in another way, if baby Isaiah were in Winnipeg, the "plug" may have already been pulled.
I am an intensive care physician practising in Manitoba. I provided care in a similar case involving an adult patient. During this patient's long intensive care unit stay, much distress was experienced by the medical staff and the family. Trust was lost on both sides of this conflict.
In my investigation of Isaiah, I learned that he had gained weight, moved and breathed occasionally on his own. His photos displayed an infant who by all accounts seemed normal in appearance apart from some paraphernalia of the critical care trade.
Although the issue before the court is the degree of brain injury incurred by Isaiah, I realize that it is Isaiah's status as a human being that is on trial. In contemporary thought, once born, humanity is considered automatic and should not be revoked by disability. The yardstick of being a human being is set too high for Isaiah. Discussion on the prediction of degree of disability, including mental capacity, is not relevant as are counter-arguments based on the physical appearance of normalcy. All that really matters, to be blunt, is if Isaiah is dead or alive. Brain death is complete and irreversible cessation of all brain function from the cortex to the brainstem. In some circumstances, the heart may still beat, the blood circulates and many organ systems can still operate. Patients who are brain dead are quite unstable even with the functions listed above working. Most patients with cessation of brain function experience rapid multiple organ system failure unless doctors intervene. If Isaiah is alive, which includes everything but brain dead, he is entitled to the full rights and privileges of any living Canadian citizen.
As a physician, I am profoundly concerned that I am allowed by college decree, or worse, potentially by statute, to take a life, as an agent of the state. I refuse to be a selector. My moral obligation as a physician demands that I not participate in the debate except to say that I treat all human beings the same. This rationing debate feels like code to me for something more sinister. There is no more important consideration to me than guarding against the abuse of my professional power in the way that I deal with vulnerable people who seek my care.
_____________________________________
Dr. Joel B. Zivot, an associate professor in the department of anesthesiology, University of Manitoba, is the director of the intensive care unit, cardiac sciences program, at St. Boniface General Hospital.
Perfectly stated!
Pro-Life Ping
Canada Ping
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Not just a clump of tissues.
Any pictures of Baby Isaiah available? Thanks!
Regards,
Excellent article.
It's here, and it's now.
The gov't, apparently, owns your life...
You have only a tenuous lease on it.
Not that I know of.
Everyone knows this. It's why the deathbots claim their victims and intended victims are already dead, even though they know it isn't true. If they were to admit Terri Schiavo was alive, they'd have to admit she had the rights of personhood. And they can't do that. I was reading posts from a Canadian website about Baby Isaiah. The overwhelming sentiment was that he isn't human, and shouldn't receive any care of any kind. Godless people are nauseating.
A dear family in VA ... their fourth baby daughter was born the exact same way-lack of oxygen during delivery. She was so severly disabled. But so loved and cared for by her family, extended church family, and those doctors, nurses, and home health providers involved in her care. Her name was Gabriella-Gaby for short, and it was nothing short of a miracle that she made it through her first year. There were many rough moments, but some good, heartwarming moments as well.
Gaby passed away last year at the tender age of 6. Her parents never imagined that given how she arrived into the world, she ever stood a chance of making it as long as she did. But through all of her precious young lfe, I don’t think one day passed without her parents having trusted in God to give them the grace, patience, dignity, perseverence, desire and assurance that they were to love and nuture Gaby—as unto the Lord.
I cannot begin to tell you of what a testimony this family was and continues to be through such a trying experience. God used the life of precious Gaby to bring honor and glory to Him—her parents knew in their hearts they could never deny the privilege of serving Him through the love and care for one of His own.
I’ve done some business with Canadians and have gotten to know some of them fairly well. I’ve talked to quite a few Canadians who HATE their healthcare system and I’ve met a bunch of upper-middle class and wealthy Canadians who put money aside to travel to the United States, Mexico and Europe if necessary for medical care, they simply aren’t willing to wait for routine procedures to treat things like heart disease.
I think I saw a picture of Baby Isaiah a few days ago. It was small, and didn’t show him very clearly through the hospital equipment. I could be mistaken. It may have been a picture of a different baby, just used to enhance the story about Isaiah.
If I can find a picture of him, I’ll post it and ping you to it.
Isaiah James, born in October of 2009, is shown in a provided image.
Isaiah
His parents
Baby Isaiah: Does Futile Care Hurt More Than It Helps?
.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
