Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Haven’t Obama, Pelosi Jettisoned Rep. Gregory Meeks?
NLPC ^ | February 21, 2010 | Peter Flaherty

Posted on 02/21/2010 10:50:10 AM PST by jazusamo

You would think that Democratic leaders would distance themselves from a member of Congress whose been identified with Ponzi swindler Allen Stanford, not mention a charity that is now under federal investigation for fraudulently raising money for Hurricane Katrina victims. Nope.

According to one media report:

President Barack Obama of the United States of America has dispatched a five-member delegation of US congressmen led by Representative Gregory Meeks to Zimbabwe.

Maybe it is appropriate, after all. Meeks seems to have a special rapport with tyrants. Zimbabwe is one the most corrupt places on the face of the earth and strongman Robert Mugabe has done his best to destroy democracy, human rights and private property.

The Miami Herald reported in December that former Stanford employees alleged that Stanford asked Meeks in 2006 to help retaliate against a former Stanford executive named Gonzalo Tirado in Venezuela who was attempting to blow the whistle on Stanford fraud. Stanford allegedly asked Meeks to call Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez. Stanford wanted Chavez to go after whistleblower Tirado, who was indicted a year later.

Mugabe met with Meeks and the others, taking time out from a busy week of enhancing his despot credentials. Mugabe is trying to force foreign-owned companies to achieve black-majority shareholders status within five years. And they will have 45 days to tell the government how they are going to do it. No doubt, Mugabe is willing to provide a convenient list of relatives and cronies who can serve as shareholders. According to the Wall Street Journal:

Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai, until February 2009 an opposition leader, has ordered the law withdrawn, saying it will heighten Zimbabwe's reputation as a risky investment destination. He and his partners have said the law was published without their consent.

Mugabe and Tsvangirai participate in a power sharing arrangement that has largely been ignored by Mugabe. To protest Mugabe’s failure to honor the agreement, the European Union on Tuesday extended its economic sanctions on Zimbabwe for another year.

But Meeks had a different take on Mugabe. According to allAfrica.com, Meeks said:

As you know, he is a great man and we look forward to continue working with him until we have a relationship that all of us want to have.

If the prospect of this hustler from Queens being allowed to wade into a sensitive foreign policy situation is enough to make you wonder whether the White House is really aware of Meeks and what he is up to, consider that the White House reportedly sent Meeks in September 2009 to try to convince New York Governor David Paterson not to seek re-election.

On Bloomberg Television, Meeks claimed that the White House "never said, 'Go tell Gov. Paterson he should step down, he should not run for re-election.'" Instead, Meeks put it this way:

The administration had indicated that they had some troubles, you know, looking at what the solution is and we’re getting close to 2010 and they wanted to make sure that we go into 2010 as strong as possible…

Basically, I was just telling the governor that there were some issues the administration has. And that he needs to try to talk to some folks in the administration to see if they can be resolved.

Meeks then when on to say he would not go into the content of a private conversation. If the White House picked Meeks to deliver the message because of his ability to be discrete, they got the wrong person. The flavor of all this is, “Hey look at me. I’m Barack Obama’s guy in New York.” With all the embarrassing headlines in the intervening weeks, why hasn’t the White House distanced itself from Meeks?

Of course, Meeks’ problems have so far been mostly a local New York politics story that has morphed into the larger one about the granting of a lucrative gambling franchise to a company called Aqueduct Entertainment Group by Paterson, involving the same cast of characters who set up the charity now being investigated.

It is only a matter of time, however, before House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will have to start facing questions about Meeks. She is the one who promised to “drain the swamp” of Congressional corruption. With Congress’ approval ratings near an all-time low, it would seem that “zero tolerance” would have to be the only defensible reaction to corruption of the Meeks variety.

But as we have seen in the Charles Rangel case, Pelosi is a prisoner of her own ideology that allows for a racial component to every event. Meeks seems aware of this. According to the New York Daily News on Tuesday:

Rep. Gregory Meeks insists race is playing a role in the criticism being heaped on Aqueduct racino investors the Rev. Floyd Flake and Darryl Greene.

"The only two people who come from the community and the only two people of color are singled out," Meeks (D-Queens) told the Daily News in a recent interview.

Asked if the controversy over their involvement with Aqueduct Entertainment Group was racially motivated, Meeks replied: "It seems to me if it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck ..."

AEG brought in the politically influential Flake, who once held Meeks' congressional seat, and Greene to act as liaisons to the southeast Queens community.

Meeks said Greene's detractors were "trying to prevent a local person of color from trying to be part of the process."

Meeks’ defense of Greene is especially bold, given the fact that Greene pled guilty to, and was convicted of, stealing $500,000 from New York City agencies in 1999. Meeks may think that he can excuse just about anything by playing the race card. It might fly in certain parts of Queens, but it will not fly nationally. And it is on the national stage that Nancy Pelosi operates.

Related:

Rep. Meeks Can’t Account for Hurricane Katrina Money; Puts Spotlight on Paterson/Flake Aqueduct Gambling Deal

Are Corrupt NY Politicians Cashing in on Aqueduct Gambling?

Rep. Gregory Meeks’ Charity Looks More Like Slush Fund



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 111th; aeg; cultureofcorruption; flake; greene; meeks; mugabe; newyork; obama; paterson; pelosi

1 posted on 02/21/2010 10:50:10 AM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Link that works, original doesn’t.

http://www.nlpc.org/


2 posted on 02/21/2010 10:51:25 AM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Wasn’t this supposed to be the cleanest, most honest, corrupt-free congress of all time?

Ya, right!


3 posted on 02/21/2010 11:05:36 AM PST by jakota (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Uh, how about Wrangell?


4 posted on 02/21/2010 11:09:23 AM PST by 999replies (Thune/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jakota

That seemed to be the story, what a crock!


5 posted on 02/21/2010 11:14:06 AM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Stanford hasn't been convicted of anything.

And two of his employee's put up for trial were found not guilty.

6 posted on 02/21/2010 11:39:54 AM PST by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
It's true there's been no conviction of Stanford but it doesn't look like he's going anywhere for a while.

Appeals court says Stanford must stay in jail

7 posted on 02/21/2010 11:49:44 AM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
It's true there's been no conviction of Stanford but it doesn't look like he's going anywhere for a while.

Very true.

Because the Government knows it has no case against him.

He wasn't running a ponzi scheme, he had assets, over a billion, that the Government seized after destroying his company.

8 posted on 02/21/2010 11:58:28 AM PST by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Lie down with Liberal corruption cooties . . . get up with Liberal corruption cooties. Pelosi is in bed with these clowns. Their cooties are her cooties. That’s how it works. She’s made her deal with evil . . . now she gets to live with it.


9 posted on 02/21/2010 12:01:08 PM PST by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Now does anybody REALLY think the Hussein administration or San Fran Nan will go after a black boy just because he’s a thug and criminal?


10 posted on 02/21/2010 12:18:41 PM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

at least two Super Bowl fundraising events scheduled by members of Congress were scrubbed at the last minute or moved to undisclosed locations. Invitations to those parties, which had been circulated two or more weeks before the game, promised Super Bowl tickets to contributors who gave either of the lawmakers $5,000.

Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., had coupled his offer with an invitation to join him over Super Bowl weekend at the posh Doral Golf Resort and Spa in Miami. Among the activities planned for the weekend was a poolside luncheon. Rep. John Conyers Jr., D-Mich., had promised contributors lunch at Joe’s Stone Crab, a popular South Beach eatery.

Rep. Kendrick Meek, D-Fla., did show up at the Biltmore Hotel in Coral Gables, Fla., for his fundraiser on Saturday afternoon. ABC News, which partnered with ProPublica in an effort to find out where the members of Congress got their Super Bowl tickets, also showed up at the hotel. But surprised Meek staffers quickly shut the door and asked the crew to leave.

As the camera continued rolling in the hallway outside the event, Meek’s staffers peeled name tags off the lapels of the congressman’s departing guests. When Meek headed for his car, ABC’s news crew peppered him with questions about how he got the Super Bowl tickets he offered to partygoers who contributed $4,800. He didn’t have answers.

The Super Bowl is one of thousands of events each year where lobbyists and others with business before the federal government provide campaign contributions to lawmakers in an attempt to ingratiate themselves and gain access. Candidates for Congress raise $1 billion every two years, primarily through these types of private get-togethers.

Most fans are forced to get their tickets on Web sites like StubHub, where a ticket for the nosebleed seats sold for about $1,800. Yet lawmakers like Conyers, Meeks and Meek have no trouble getting tickets, not only for their personal use but also to exchange for contributions that are four or five times the face value of the tickets.

On Sunday, a Meek staffer said the campaign had bought about 10 tickets from the NFL at face value for the congressman and his contributors. However, it remains unclear where Conyers and Meeks got their tickets, how much they paid for them and how much they netted by using them in their fundraising activities.

New York Congressman Meeks sits on the Financial Services Committee, which is playing a crucial role in the nation’s rebound from the 2008 credit crisis.

Florida’s Meek, now in his fourth term, is important because he’s a member of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. And he has his eye on the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Republican George LeMieux.

http://tinyurl.com/yzcvku5


11 posted on 02/21/2010 12:20:13 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Thanks for the article. These corruptocrats try to take advantage of every scam they can.


12 posted on 02/21/2010 12:38:54 PM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
You would think that Democratic leaders would distance themselves from a member of Congress whose been identified with Ponzi swindler ...

ahh, besides for his expertise - he knows knows what skeletons are in what closets?

People like this always have "insurance."

13 posted on 02/21/2010 1:27:44 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("He has the right to criticize who has the heart to help" Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Why Haven’t Obama, Pelosi Jettisoned Rep. Gregory Meeks?

Meeks had the goods on them?

14 posted on 02/21/2010 4:58:22 PM PST by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Obama can’t help himself from hanging out with thieves and the corrupt.


15 posted on 02/21/2010 7:32:36 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson