Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hugin
Are there questions surrounding the bombing of Pearl harbor?

Are there questions around if we needed to drop a A-bomb on Japan?

Are there questions surrounding the assassination of JFK?

Are there questions surrounding our actions at GITMO?

It doesn't matter where you stand, the answer is yes, some people have questions on certain aspects of every one of these and there are people an all sides of the political fence that have at least in their mind questions about 9-11. She's actually pointing out the obvious, and that doesn't make her support or personally believe in something. There are people who question the motive for the Iraq war.......... Your reasoning is something from a Monty Python video. Maybe she's a witch too?

***Her fault is that she made a comment that is in reality a "matter of fact." People have questions. She attempted to be neutral and non offensive in that statement, not alienating those that do have questions. Then, when asked about the details, she begins to babble and digs a hole because she's not an expert on this nor prepared for every twist and turn that the questions will take her. -IMHO

31 posted on 02/20/2010 11:48:15 PM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Red6

Beck didn’t ask her if she had “any questions”. He asked, “Here then let me be more frank and ask you the question: Do you believe the government was any way involved with the bringing down of the World Trade Centers on 9/11?”. You can have a ton of questions about 911, about various mistakes made, etc., but if you can’t answer that question with a straight up “No”, you are either a nutter, or pandering to nutters, and disqualified from office, IMHO.


46 posted on 02/21/2010 1:55:49 AM PST by Hugin (Remember the first rule of gunfighting...have a gun..-- Col. Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Red6

Easy there Tex! The point back is you forgot the interject the word “reasonable” in your four points.

Beck gave her three chances to correct herself during the interview and even asked if she heard the question right and she still didn’t come off her incoherent blather and dancing around the key point of the question.

Then she goes on the next day and declares that nobody from the NYPD was killed in the buildings? Yea, right; now there is a real bit of super spy research to project an objective viewpoint /sarc.

By the way, I’m a Native Texan and it does matter if someone can’t answer a straight question with a straight answer. Kinda like “Don’t stand there pissing on my boots while trying to tell me its raining”.


51 posted on 02/21/2010 4:39:05 AM PST by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate - West FL22nd - JD Hayworth - US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Red6
You are missing the point: Glen Beck didn't ask her if people had questions about it, he asked her if she, herself believed that the government had a hand in it. The correct answer, if she wants conservative votes, was NO, and she failed to give that answer even after a second chance at it later when she "clarified" her statement but said virtually the same thing she said on Beck.

Either she is a truther or she totally misunderstood the question, either way she is unfit for office, and those that compare her to Palin are full of it too, she has accomplished nothing that compares with what Palin did in Alaska.

76 posted on 02/21/2010 8:36:58 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson