What theories of 9-11 is she advocating other than that there are people that have questions out there? Is she wrong? There are people out there that are conservative, independent and liberal with questions. It's a snowball effect where she's now on the defensive about something that is perceptive and the more she talks the more she puts herself in a corner. She's doesn't pretend to be an expert on 9-11 and if you ask “why” long enough you get answers that sound like this, especially from someone who's inexperienced. This is no different than asking Palin what the Bush Doctrine was. Or asking Bush what the capital of Denmark is. She shouldn't even have gone down that road.
Well, we don't need to worry about it, she's crushed. Besides, in the good ole boy club we call the Republican Party folks like her and Palin don't have much of a chance against the McCains and Perry's who are established, networked, power brokers within the party and paid their dews. Enjoy-
I’m concerned about the La Raza thing.
If Medina has made promises to them, I’m done..the end.
I’m searching the web trying to find a anything, haven’t so far.
Of course she’s wrong about the NYPD policemen who “got out” when the firemen didn’t. Watch the press conference video in that last link. *She* gave too much information.
As she gave too much information during the original interview when she went off on the mind control/psychological testing tangent. Beck kept trying to stop her with his, “You’ve answered the question, Debra.” She just kept on trying to prove she was right and he was wrong - but used a bizarre reasoning about *why* he was wrong.
The “mind control” comment was telling. And the next day at the press conference, she told the interviewers that other people were trying to make *her* look crazy. She thinks in those terms: that people try to control the thoughts of others. She believes that people think its “crazy” to have doubts about 9-11, that the information that has been given to the public is “mind control.”
Her reaction and comments both times don’t indicate defensive political naivete. I see bull-headed irritation, especially with the accusation that Beck expected “mind control” and “psychological testing.” She was defensive only in the attempt to prove that she was right and *in* the right. What she proved was that she did, indeed, have “a position on that,” and was lying when she said she didn’t.
And, no, I don’t think she was being attacked by political enemies when Beck asked her about the 9-11 truthers. I heard the whole Beck show from her interview, on. He was surprised by her answer/non-answer. He said he expected an easy dismissal.
I do know she was interviewed several times by Alex Jones, and that he had endorsed her a couple of days earlier. http://economycollapse.blogspot.com/