Skip to comments.
EADS: USAF can buy 118 A400Ms with savings from C-130, C-5 retirements
Flightglobal ^
| 02/19/2010
| Stephen Trimble
Posted on 02/20/2010 8:27:23 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
To: rbosque
Dont the Airbus tails have a tendency to break off during stressful turns?Not that I know of, but their control software seems to take a shit at the most inopportune times.
21
posted on
02/20/2010 9:14:33 PM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: sonofstrangelove
There's no big mystery to the enlarged Airbus A400M.
Our military should not outsource it purchases to other countries.
As it appears, the A400M will need improved runways and will not be able to compete with the C-130 Herc. Time for Lockheed and Boeing to make their submissions for the replacement aircraft.
Gates is out of his ever loving mind to outsource this. The next thing will be buying Chinese or Russian made aircraft to replace the F-22 and F35.
22
posted on
02/20/2010 9:17:29 PM PST
by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: prophetic
so in the middle of a recession and with all the crap from the ONE about creating & saving jobs, this idiot of a Defense Sec wants to outsource the Air Force requisition purchasing equipment to Europe??Plus it'd probably come with the avionic equivalent of OnScar. Get in a war with Germany and all your cargo planes mysteriously keep going for a swim mid-Atlantic.
23
posted on
02/20/2010 9:17:43 PM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: sonofstrangelove
There's no big mystery to the enlarged Airbus A400M.
Our military should not outsource it purchases to other countries.
As it appears, the A400M will need improved runways and will not be able to compete with the C-130 Herc. Time for Lockheed and Boeing to make their submissions for the replacement aircraft.
Gates is out of his ever loving mind to outsource this. The next thing will be buying Chinese or Russian made aircraft to replace the F-22 and F35.
24
posted on
02/20/2010 9:21:19 PM PST
by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: sonofstrangelove
C-130J Super Hercules is the latest model but has not gone into production Looks like your info is a little more than a decade out of date.
"The latest C-130 to be produced, the C-130J entered the inventory in February 1999."
http://www.403wg.afrc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=3444
25
posted on
02/20/2010 9:21:36 PM PST
by
PAR35
To: PAR35
I am sorry. Thank you very much for the correction.
:)
26
posted on
02/20/2010 9:22:50 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
C-130J Super Hercules is the latest model but has not gone into production The C-130J is in production. Being flown by the USAF and others right now.
To: NYFreeper
I am sorry. Thank you very much for the correction.
:)
28
posted on
02/20/2010 9:25:07 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
To: NonValueAdded
f the size comparison data is accurate and the C-130 can't carry strykers, OK they have a point. But C-5s? The behemoth of the sky? dunno.
If I'm not mistaken the C-130 is one of the finest aircraft ever built and unless all cargo is C-5 size it makes no sense.
What next? Retire pick-ups and buy more 5 tons tonnes...from europe?
30
posted on
02/20/2010 9:31:16 PM PST
by
lewislynn
(What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
To: sonofstrangelove
![](http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/middle/0/8/4/1322480.jpg)
Vs
![](http://www.aviationexplorer.com/Airbus_A400M/Airbus_Military_A400m_Cargo_Aircraft.jpg)
I don't think so.
31
posted on
02/20/2010 9:32:10 PM PST
by
OCC
To: sonofstrangelove
And while I’m fact checking,
“The A400M features a 3.96m (13ft) cabin diameter, versus the C-130 family’s 2.74m-wide cargo bay. “
The C-130 is only 2.74m high, but it is 3.12 meters wide. Don’t know if the Airbus numbers are correct.
32
posted on
02/20/2010 9:32:56 PM PST
by
PAR35
To: PAR35
33
posted on
02/20/2010 9:43:13 PM PST
by
Irenic
To: Jet Jaguar
34
posted on
02/20/2010 9:48:20 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: sonofstrangelove
And just what is the need for something in this range? We have somewhat less capacity in the small, cheap, abundant C-130, and a hell of a lot more in the somewhat bigger C-17 (in which we can carry up to an M-1). Why do we need this middle-sized plane?
To: antiRepublicrat
Secretary Gates would have the answers to all these questions. And they are good questions too.
36
posted on
02/20/2010 9:52:08 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
I’d go for the AN-70 over the Airbus.
37
posted on
02/20/2010 9:54:44 PM PST
by
Ronin
To: Ronin
38
posted on
02/20/2010 9:55:59 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
"C-130J .....has not gone into production."
Uhhhh...been in production for over ten years.
To: sonofstrangelove
C-130J Super Hercules is the latest model but has not gone into productionBS
40
posted on
02/20/2010 10:02:15 PM PST
by
A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson