Posted on 02/19/2010 7:35:34 PM PST by DesertRenegade
Ryan Sorba, from the Young Americans for Freedom organization’s California chapter, was booed off the stage tonight at CPAC, for deriding CPAC’s choice to have GOProud attend CPAC, even going so far as to say he “condemns CPAC”. Not the sort of thing one would say when invited to speak at the biggest gathering of Conservatives who look to CPAC for guidance and networking.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightpundits.com ...
Unfortunately you won't find them admitting that the military MUST inquire into sexual inclinations for everyone lest the sexual sadists get in and do what they do.
Not that all the sexual sadists are homosexual, or vice versa, but both orientations must be viewed as pathologies and not as normal conditions when it comes to military duty. After all, the "tests" for both conditions are the same and it's really difficult to tell them apart until the dead and mutilated bodies start showing up.
It's not that there are more of them, but the ones we still have are just out in public more.
Those people cruise night and day.
I am correct and you are not being honest; I was replying to this:
“I think a lot of what was on this thread was actually good. As others have said, no matter what we do people will call it homophobia. But I think it matters whether they are right or wrong on that assessment.”
You very clearly stated that it MATTERS whether the homosexual agenda pushers are right or wrong about conservatives being “homophobes” - IOW, we should make sure we don’t come across as “haters” and “bigots” and “homophobes”. Their opinion “matters”; they have to realize we are not “homophobes”.
You are buying their garbage by saying that.
The only way they won’t think conservatives are “homophobes” is by joining their team and pushing their agenda along with them. Other than that, we remain “homophobes”.
I can’t understand why this is unclear to you.
And so.
The leftist tactics that both muslim and homosexual groups use at universities (shouting down speakers they disagree with) are now being used at CPAC?
I think the group GoPride just PROVED Ryan Sorba’s point.
I'm sure he had liberal/Communist friends from Hollywood as well. That doesn't mean he agreed with their agenda any more than he agreed with the homosexual one.
Homosexuality was a crime throughout most of the nation's history. It's a sad day when those that are supposed to be standing for the principles that were the foundation of the country embrace sexual perversion.
They already are by making an issue of their sexuality. If they believed in limited government and lower taxes, they would have joined other organizations and not drawn attention to their sexuality.
On the Spartans-—it’s too easy to make generalizations on whether homosexuality was normalized or not. It was not.
Honmosexuality was never considered “normal” in ancient Spartan society.
JimRob - just bringing your attention to this gem.
Oh, Pete - I am a Hindu. And neither Hindus nor Christians nor Jews nor Buddhists nor Jains nor Sikhs accept homosexuality as natural and normal, nor do any of them advocate stoning anyone for adultery.
PS - you’re a nutcase.
Dick Cheney's daughter is gay and he supports her right to be gay. I don't know if that qualifies as "embracing her lifestyle" or not. What do you think?
Cheney has long departed from conservative orthodoxy on the issue of gay marriage, saying during the 2000 presidential campaign that the matter should be left to the states. He also prompted an uproar during the 2004 race when he appeared to distance himself from a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, which was strongly supported by his boss, George W. Bush.
It seems it should be acceptable to have gay, fiscal and foreign policy conservatives among us as long as their personal lives and proclivities do not become center stage. If they want to join us in championing limited government, lower taxes, the rule of law, individual liberty, free enterprise, energy independence and a strong national defense then we are better off to include them than not. I understand many of them are pro-life as well.
That doesn't mean we change our position on family values and traditional marriage. Our platform remains unchanged on that and they have to accept that. Both groups just agree to disagree on that issue. I see problms arising with only the most militant groups who refuse to agree to disagree (on both sides).
It’s not just them but also the countless millions of straight vermin who support this evil. It is logistically impossible to crush this amount of corruption. All we can do is make their worthless lives as difficult as possible.
What on earth do you mean by “both sides”?
There is no militancy by conservatives, only the homosexual agenda pushers. How are conservatives being militants?
If they are influencing others to engage in behavior that is detrimental to society, they diminish the quality of life for everyone in it.
Are you a psychopathic sexual sadist or just trying real hard to immitate one?
As abundantly substantiated, and some on his thread, the nature of homosexuality is antithetical to conservative values. It maybe for lower taxes and smaller government, but its advocation of homosexuality works against such, due to both the effects of homosexuality and the movement that it is part of.
You cannot separate fiscal conservatism and small government from moral values, as the loss of the latter requires growth of the former, and the Founders largely recognized that while Church and State were to be separate, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” (John Adams, who sometimes sounded like an agnostic).
Again, see where the “war on God” is costing us in sous, lives and money: http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/RevealingStatistics.html
That is exactly right. I would just add the word homosexual agendas. No personal sexual agendas allowed. Keep it at home.
That is complete horse manure, one that can't be validated with facts. Reagan set the stage for a Republican majority by making those issues a part of the Republican platform to draw in socially conservative Democrats and Catholics.
The only time McCain led in the 2008 was after he named a pro-life Christians as his running mate.
The pro-life position has been gaining ground, especially among younger people
A pro-life governor just won in New Jersey while one was winning a landslide in Virginia.
So, you have no facts to make up the garbage you're spewing.
So, was homosexuality before leftists and their homosexual allies put it on the agenda to normalize it 50 or so years ago.
I think there are some on our side who are not satisfied to “agree to disagree” even if the gay conservative agrees with 99% of everything else we believe in and is not attempting to promote a homosexual agenda. See #597.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.