Ryan Sorba booed off CPAC stage for anti-homosexual remarks

Right Pundits ^ | Feb 19, 2010 | Donald Borsch Jr.

[DesertRenegade]

Ryan Sorba, from the Young Americans for Freedom organization’s California chapter, was booed off the stage tonight at CPAC, for deriding CPAC’s choice to have GOProud attend CPAC, even going so far as to say he “condemns CPAC”. Not the sort of thing one would say when invited to speak at the biggest gathering of Conservatives who look to CPAC for guidance and networking.

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

thanks for a reasoned response!

[Vaquero]

are there really any more or less than 50...100 years ago...or are they just OUT THERE now.

I prefered it when they were in the closet.

but that is just my preference.

[seekthetruth]

If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn’t buy one.
If GOProud doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn’t eat meat.
If GOProud is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If GOProud is homosexual, he demands legislated respect and shouts down speakers at CPAC.

If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
GOProud wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels.
GOProud demand that those they don't like be shut down.

If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church.
A GOProud non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced. (Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)

If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
GOProud demands that the rest of us pay for his.

If a conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh.
GOProud will delete it because the nancy boy's “offended” ...

EXCELLENT POST!!

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

Thanks for the reality test.

[sauropod]

So CPAC is really not conservative.

And this is a news flash to you why?

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

Excellant analysis and a a good perspective.

[NotSoModerate]

The government is actively replacing AWOL parents and by a large percentage the male is the absent parent.

I'll let you in on a little secret concerning government numbers and AWOL fathers:

The figures are hugely overblown. The reason: in the ghetto many AWOL fathers aren't AWOL at all... they're actually there in the home... but they claim not to be because it gives the family more government benefits. I know, I've lived in the ghetto my entire life.

My father refused to lie in order to get benefits... so we struggled mightily. Very few people are willing to bite the bullet and refuse government benefits when they're dangled in front of their faces everyday.

And for those that lie for the benefits guess what happens? Big brother comes around to check and see if the father is actually AWOL. When that happens the men have to leave the home, or stay and lose the benefits. Most leave with the idea that they'll stay close by and still provide for the family.... but of coarse that never happens... eventually they slowly detach from the family and really do become AWOL. I've seen it happen a million times.

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

Sexuality is a very emotional topic...and the reactions of posters here shows that. It is often difficult to have a discussion that is reasoned because of that.

I really don’t appreciate using crude physical descriptions as a way to make one’s argument.

I give you credit for responding in a rational way.

[dervish]

don’t be. He said it should be left to the military brass.

Read his own words before you condemn him.

[xsmommy]

I am also opposed to the promotion of homosexuality. I just don't think that politically we can be the party that hates homosexuals. I think there is a difference between the two, and I think we can condemn the homosexual agenda without condemning homosexuals for their personal choices.

can you illustrate how that could be done? concrete examples? because what i have seen condemned on this thread as hatred, appears in large part merely to be a desire that the conservative agenda NOT promote the homosexual agenda, and not animus against homosexuals themselves. So, i would be interested to hear specifically what you think can be done to acheive that end while not imparting what you consider to be hatred.

[xzins]

same here...

drank the kool-aid from his daughter’s hand

[little jeremiah]

I’m not shocked; disappointed thought. He was in favor of at least civil unions and maybe even same sex marriage a while ago; also his wife, as stated on FR a long time ago, wrote some kind of book in which scenes of human/animal sex were described.

So, I am not shocked.

It seems among the political elites, sexual perversion is widely accepted.

[trisham]

I read his words. I remain more than disappointed.

[little jeremiah]

There aren’t. Less than 2%. They just have a lot of leftists on their side and so-called Repugs.

[Grunthor]

“booed off CPAC stage for anti-homosexual remarks”

Answer to “What is wrong with todays’ CPAC?”

[trisham]

drank the kool-aid from his daughter’s hand.

********************

Agreed.

[Grunthor]

Is that GOproud at the Fair?

[trisham]

I’d forgotten about the book. That did shock me.

[b4its2late]

Yep. The parts just don't fit like they were intended to.

[Grampa Dave]

“Once upon a time, gay groups attended various Christian churches, claiming only to want to worship along with everyone else. Now, many of those churches have fallen because of them and blatantly ignore scripture because it might offend the gays. No thanks.”

Amen Brother. In two decades these so called Christian gays have subverted the Episcopal and other churches and basically taken over at national levels. Once that happens, you get to see their real dark side.

It is obvious with the McQueeg Liberals posing as Republicans, that family with the left wing mediots are pushing the gay agenda over a lot of republicans, who are asleep using the big tent lie.