Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ryan Sorba booed off CPAC stage for anti-homosexual remarks
Right Pundits ^ | Feb 19, 2010 | Donald Borsch Jr.

Posted on 02/19/2010 7:35:34 PM PST by DesertRenegade

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,161-1,169 next last
To: eddie willers

thanks for a reasoned response!


481 posted on 02/20/2010 7:07:00 AM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (Ok, joke's over....Bring back Bush !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Big Horn

are there really any more or less than 50...100 years ago...or are they just OUT THERE now.

I prefered it when they were in the closet.

but that is just my preference.


482 posted on 02/20/2010 7:07:00 AM PST by Vaquero (BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn’t buy one.
If GOProud doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn’t eat meat.
If GOProud is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If GOProud is homosexual, he demands legislated respect and shouts down speakers at CPAC.

If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
GOProud wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels.
GOProud demand that those they don't like be shut down.

If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church.
A GOProud non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced. (Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)

If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
GOProud demands that the rest of us pay for his.

If a conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh.
GOProud will delete it because the nancy boy's “offended” ...

EXCELLENT POST!!

483 posted on 02/20/2010 7:07:36 AM PST by seekthetruth (MY PRAYER EVERY DAY OF 2010---- PSALM 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: norge

Thanks for the reality test.


484 posted on 02/20/2010 7:09:50 AM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (Ok, joke's over....Bring back Bush !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
So CPAC is really not conservative.

And this is a news flash to you why?

485 posted on 02/20/2010 7:10:07 AM PST by sauropod (People who do things are people that get things done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Excellant analysis and a a good perspective.


486 posted on 02/20/2010 7:10:58 AM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (Ok, joke's over....Bring back Bush !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic
The government is actively replacing AWOL parents and by a large percentage the male is the absent parent.

I'll let you in on a little secret concerning government numbers and AWOL fathers:

The figures are hugely overblown. The reason: in the ghetto many AWOL fathers aren't AWOL at all... they're actually there in the home... but they claim not to be because it gives the family more government benefits. I know, I've lived in the ghetto my entire life.

My father refused to lie in order to get benefits... so we struggled mightily. Very few people are willing to bite the bullet and refuse government benefits when they're dangled in front of their faces everyday.

And for those that lie for the benefits guess what happens? Big brother comes around to check and see if the father is actually AWOL. When that happens the men have to leave the home, or stay and lose the benefits. Most leave with the idea that they'll stay close by and still provide for the family.... but of coarse that never happens... eventually they slowly detach from the family and really do become AWOL. I've seen it happen a million times.

487 posted on 02/20/2010 7:12:45 AM PST by NotSoModerate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Sexuality is a very emotional topic...and the reactions of posters here shows that. It is often difficult to have a discussion that is reasoned because of that.

I really don’t appreciate using crude physical descriptions as a way to make one’s argument.

I give you credit for responding in a rational way.


488 posted on 02/20/2010 7:13:58 AM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (Ok, joke's over....Bring back Bush !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: trisham

don’t be. He said it should be left to the military brass.

Read his own words before you condemn him.


489 posted on 02/20/2010 7:14:13 AM PST by dervish (I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I am also opposed to the promotion of homosexuality. I just don't think that politically we can be the party that hates homosexuals. I think there is a difference between the two, and I think we can condemn the homosexual agenda without condemning homosexuals for their personal choices.

can you illustrate how that could be done? concrete examples? because what i have seen condemned on this thread as hatred, appears in large part merely to be a desire that the conservative agenda NOT promote the homosexual agenda, and not animus against homosexuals themselves. So, i would be interested to hear specifically what you think can be done to acheive that end while not imparting what you consider to be hatred.

490 posted on 02/20/2010 7:17:13 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: trisham

same here...

drank the kool-aid from his daughter’s hand


491 posted on 02/20/2010 7:19:19 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: trisham

I’m not shocked; disappointed thought. He was in favor of at least civil unions and maybe even same sex marriage a while ago; also his wife, as stated on FR a long time ago, wrote some kind of book in which scenes of human/animal sex were described.

So, I am not shocked.

It seems among the political elites, sexual perversion is widely accepted.


492 posted on 02/20/2010 7:19:35 AM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: dervish

I read his words. I remain more than disappointed.


493 posted on 02/20/2010 7:19:38 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: Big Horn

There aren’t. Less than 2%. They just have a lot of leftists on their side and so-called Repugs.


494 posted on 02/20/2010 7:20:52 AM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

“booed off CPAC stage for anti-homosexual remarks”

Answer to “What is wrong with todays’ CPAC?”


495 posted on 02/20/2010 7:20:57 AM PST by Grunthor (America needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
drank the kool-aid from his daughter’s hand.

********************

Agreed.

496 posted on 02/20/2010 7:23:26 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Is that GOproud at the Fair?


497 posted on 02/20/2010 7:26:07 AM PST by Grunthor (America needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I’d forgotten about the book. That did shock me.


498 posted on 02/20/2010 7:26:55 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
Yep. The parts just don't fit like they were intended to.

499 posted on 02/20/2010 7:27:39 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak; DirtyHarryY2K; wagglebee; little jeremiah

“Once upon a time, gay groups attended various Christian churches, claiming only to want to worship along with everyone else. Now, many of those churches have fallen because of them and blatantly ignore scripture because it might offend the gays. No thanks.”

Amen Brother. In two decades these so called Christian gays have subverted the Episcopal and other churches and basically taken over at national levels. Once that happens, you get to see their real dark side.

It is obvious with the McQueeg Liberals posing as Republicans, that family with the left wing mediots are pushing the gay agenda over a lot of republicans, who are asleep using the big tent lie.


500 posted on 02/20/2010 7:28:28 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Does 0b0z0 have any friends, who aren't traitors, spies, tax cheats and criminals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,161-1,169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson