To: VRWCTexan
from the extent of the fire, it looks like the pilot may have had some kind of accelerant on the plane. A small plane like that should not cause a fire that extensive, imho. It looks like the fire spread 100’s of feet horizontally to me, which seems unusual.
50 posted on
02/18/2010 8:38:35 AM PST by
milwguy
To: milwguy
Would a plane do that if it was fully topped with fuel? I do think it seems pretty strange.
To: TexasValerie
Said to be a SR-20 Cirrus:
IIIRC, this plane has its own parachute.
Valerie? Please check in...
79 posted on
02/18/2010 8:44:37 AM PST by
null and void
(We are now in day 392 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: milwguy
from the extent of the fire, it looks like the pilot may have had some kind of accelerant on the plane. A small plane like that should not cause a fire that extensive, imho. It looks like the fire spread 100’s of feet horizontally to me, which seems unusual.
Yes, it looks like the whole interior is ablaze. A "small plane" like a Cessna 182 wouldn't do that. It must've been a larger aircraft, maybe something like a Gulfstream or Learjet.
96 posted on
02/18/2010 8:46:32 AM PST by
Spirochete
(Texas is an anagram for Taxes)
To: milwguy
it looks like the pilot may have had some kind of accelerant on the plane. You mean, airplane fuel? :-?
157 posted on
02/18/2010 8:58:46 AM PST by
theDentist
(fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
To: milwguy
Yes - my though as well - appears to be way too much building fire for such as small plane
550 posted on
02/18/2010 9:56:27 AM PST by
VRWCTexan
(Obama-scare is the "real" Cash for Clunker Program!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson