[cowboyway]

Actually it was your comment that was irrelevant since the topic of the thread was the right to secede, not the right to rebel. But I doubt you read that far to begin with.

My comment was totally relevant.

You, being the constitutional giant that you are, were attempting to correct Scalia with only half of the answer. (The one that you subscribe to and have iterated ad infinitum.)

I simply pointed out that you had conveniently left out a rather important part of the majority opinion.

Of course, being the consummate troll, you countered with that imbecilic 'how'd that work out for ya' post.

Which is the reason why you don't begin to meet the requirements expected of a mod,

What requirements?

Being an unemployed bore with a PC, like you?

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Non-Sequitur]

My comment was totally relevant.

As relevant as most of your crap, which is virtually nil. The thread is on secession. Justice Scalia says it is not Constitutional and that the Supreme Court ruled on it. I'm pointing out that the same decision identified one way to legally secede. The rebellion part is not relevant to that discussion. Your relevance to any discussion is usually problematic at best.

You, being the constitutional giant that you are, were attempting to correct Scalia with only half of the answer. (The one that you subscribe to and have iterated ad infinitum.)

There is only one Constitutional answer. Unless you can point to the clause in the Constitution allowing rebellion.

Of course, being the consummate troll, you countered with that imbecilic 'how'd that work out for ya' post.

Which was more than your imbecilic remark deserved.

Being an unemployed bore with a PC, like you?

Truth for one. Intelligence for another. Two qualities lacking in that remark, and all your other ones as well.