As relevant as most of your crap, which is virtually nil. The thread is on secession. Justice Scalia says it is not Constitutional and that the Supreme Court ruled on it. I'm pointing out that the same decision identified one way to legally secede. The rebellion part is not relevant to that discussion. Your relevance to any discussion is usually problematic at best.
You, being the constitutional giant that you are, were attempting to correct Scalia with only half of the answer. (The one that you subscribe to and have iterated ad infinitum.)
There is only one Constitutional answer. Unless you can point to the clause in the Constitution allowing rebellion.
Of course, being the consummate troll, you countered with that imbecilic 'how'd that work out for ya' post.
Which was more than your imbecilic remark deserved.
Being an unemployed bore with a PC, like you?
Truth for one. Intelligence for another. Two qualities lacking in that remark, and all your other ones as well.
You're such a hypocrite. You try to hijack every thread posted about the WBTS by launching into totally irrelevant topics and personal attacks.
Unless you can point to the clause in the Constitution allowing rebellion.
If you actually read the article, which I doubt, you'll know that it all starts with the question, "Is there a right to secede from the Union, or did the Civil War settle that?"
Pay attention to the word 'right'. I know that you atheist have a hard time with this next part, but our 'rights' are endowed by our Creator, a loving God.
You may also know that the Constitution is a document limiting government and that the 10th Amendment states that: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
These are God given rights and they include the right to choose ones own destiny and neither you nor any of the rest of the damnyankee communist coven can take that away.