Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sure looks like Romney’s running in 2012
Hot Air ^ | 2-15-10 | Allahpundit

Posted on 02/15/2010 5:51:45 PM PST by TitansAFC

Just from the perspective of blogworthy content, I’m thrilled. A Huck vs. Palin race would be fascinating, but having Mitt in the mix all but guarantees a “centrist elites vs. populist conservatives” storyline for the nomination. Can’t. Wait.

One of the first big moves of 2012 — “Mitt Romney Names Matt Rhoades PAC Executive Director: BOSTON — Mitt Romney’s Free and Strong America PAC announced today that Matt Rhoades, who has held senior positions on major presidential campaigns and at the Republican National Committee, will serve as the PAC’s executive director. … ‘He’s been a friend and an adviser for several years now and I’m pleased that he has agreed to run the day-to-day operations of my Free and Strong America PAC. He shares with me the view that 2010 is going to be a critical election year, with many races and lots of opportunities to elect Republican candidates,’ said Governor Romney.

“Rhoades is currently a Vice President with DCI Group … He replaces Peter Flaherty, who will become a Senior Adviser to the PAC. He previously served as Communications Director for Romney’s 2008 presidential campaign … During the 2006 election cycle, Rhoades was a Deputy Communications Director in charge of research for the Republican National Committee. He also was Research Director for the 2004 Bush/Cheney re-election campaign. Rhoades also has held the position of White House Liaison at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management in the Bush Administration.

According to Ben Smith, who’s reading this as a surefire sign that Mitt’s in, Rhoades also has a pipeline to Drudge. Consider this a follow-up to last night’s Quotes of the Day that showcased the makings of a bold Romney gambit: A path to the nomination that would concede the south to whomever emerges from a Huck/Palin bloodbath and focus instead on winning New Hampshire and Michigan early and then cleaning up in the coastal states. (Don’t laugh: Scott Brown’s win reportedly has Republicans coming out of the woodwork in blue New England.) I find it hard to fathom losing Iowa, South Carolina, and Florida to an opponent and then cleaning up on Super Tuesday, so expect Team Mitt to quietly push behind the scenes for bluer states to move their own primaries up to help their guy build a little early mo.

Here’s Ron Brownstein from this a.m.’s “Morning Joe” handicapping a Romney/Palin white collar/blue collar class warfare clusterfark in the primary. My heart says “stop” but my traffic sensibility cries “proceed.” Exit question: Are Huck and Palin going to come to some sort of understanding before the primaries that only one of them should run? If they both jump in and draw off each other, it leaves Romney alone to skate through by cleaning up with centrists. And Huck, at least, would probably find that prospect intolerable.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012gopprimary; mitt; palin; romney; romney2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: TitansAFC

In 2008, we had a nit-wit at the top of the ticket, we can’t afford a MITT-wit in 2012.

FR is a no-Willard zone.


21 posted on 02/15/2010 6:04:40 PM PST by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Well he is obviously going to run on the GOP ticket in 2012. If Sarah Palin can’t beat Romney in the GOP promaries, then she sure as heck wouldn’t have won in the general elections either. I like her chances against Romney though.


22 posted on 02/15/2010 6:05:16 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative

You’re kind of making my point.

Didn’t everone say the same thing about McCain after Bush (”No more RINOs”).

We must learn from history - the GOP establishment has gotten the guy they wanted in every race in my lifetime except Reagan vs. Bush. They know how to get this done in SPITE of the grassroots, with many of the aforementioned old school tricks.

You can SAY “Romney is dead” all you want, it does not change the fact that in reality he is the heavy favorite to win 51% of the delegates.


23 posted on 02/15/2010 6:07:00 PM PST by TitansAFC (The Left does not devote so much effort into attacking Sarah Palin because she's a weak candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Q: Are you still for the Brady Bill?
A: The Brady Bill has changed over time, and, of course, technology has changed over time. I would have supported the original assault weapon ban. I signed an assault weapon ban in Massachusetts governor because it provided for a relaxation of licensing requirements for gun owners in Massachusetts, which was a big plus. And so both the pro-gun and the anti-gun lobby came together with a bill, and I signed that. And if there is determined to be, from time to time, a weapon of such lethality that it poses a grave risk to our law enforcement personnel, that's something I would consider signing. There's nothing of that nature that's being proposed today in Washington. But I would look at weapons that pose extraordinary lethality.
Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series Dec 16, 2007

"Shall not be infringed", "Right of the People", "laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding", Title 18 Sect 242.

FU WIllard. Go away...

24 posted on 02/15/2010 6:08:15 PM PST by Dead Corpse (III, Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Who Cares?


25 posted on 02/15/2010 6:08:26 PM PST by MaxCUA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

... and then crash and burn in the general when the American public chooses the authentic Liberal over the Liberal pretending to be conservative again.


26 posted on 02/15/2010 6:09:08 PM PST by Ingtar (I closed my eyes, only for a moment, and the moment's gone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
You can SAY “Romney is dead” all you want, it does not change the fact that in reality he is the heavy favorite to win 51% of the delegates.

He's certainly the favorite. Whether he's the "heavy" favorite remains to be seen. JMO.

27 posted on 02/15/2010 6:11:01 PM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Not getting my vote. I’m voting PALIN! And proud to do it whether she runs or not!


28 posted on 02/15/2010 6:13:06 PM PST by Doc Savage (SOBAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Should have been a “double barf alert” on that post.


29 posted on 02/15/2010 6:13:39 PM PST by flash2368
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

Another big government Republican we don’t need.


30 posted on 02/15/2010 6:14:02 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

1.) Huckabee has basically ruled out a 2012 run. I don’t think he believes he can win in 2012 (though 2016 I would not rule out).
- - - - - - - - -

I think Huckabee *is* planning a run in 2012.

Romney is a non-starter for me. Same goes for Huckabee.

My concentration is on this year’s elections.


31 posted on 02/15/2010 6:14:54 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

And just like McCain, he will loose the general election. And I don’t believe in the inevitability of his nomination. Things change.


32 posted on 02/15/2010 6:15:22 PM PST by ABQHispConservative (A good Blue Dog is an unelected Blue Dog. Ditto Rino's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: WVNan

Sarah has her big money people as well. The think is we just do not hear about them. Sarah meet with money people in Tenn. when she was there. I would find it hard believe Sarah hasn’t put the word out to folks on the state level. During her book tour Sarah took time to meet and greet GOPers before the public at just about every stop. I would not be surprised Sarah meet some today in FL. Tomorrow she is in AR to fund raise for the AR GOP. One other thing big money is only one vote but a lot a small donations is many votes.


33 posted on 02/15/2010 6:16:06 PM PST by Clyde5445 (Gov. Sarah Palin: :"You have to sacrifice to win. That's my philosophy in 6 words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Imagine Mitt at the Daytona 500 addressing the crowd.

Now review the tape of Sarah addressing the crowd yesterday.

Mitt has zero charisma.

Dead candidate walking.


34 posted on 02/15/2010 6:16:49 PM PST by Andy from Chapel Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

At my Precinct Caucus this last Saturday Romney was a distant second in a straw vote taken at the door. Palin was the leader by several votes.

When I think of Mitt I think about that GOP Debate “show of hands” question. Question - “Show of hands, if you think climate change is a serious threat and man is the major cause of it.”

Hands that went up, McCain, Rudy, Mitt, and Huckabee - before Fred Thompson saved their butts with the were not playing hand games here.

The Video speaks for itself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAYtC_jcK1U


35 posted on 02/15/2010 6:17:22 PM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Romney running? Good.
I hope he takes a nice long run off a short pier.
I won't vote for that slimy RINO.
36 posted on 02/15/2010 6:18:05 PM PST by 50cal Smokepole (Effective gun control involves effective recoil management)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Please no Huck, Palin or Mitt. But who? We appear to have such a shallow bench...


37 posted on 02/15/2010 6:19:19 PM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Here! I’ve got YOUR favorites!! Bob Dole, Gerald Ford, John McLame, George H.W.Bush , George W. Bush. All Moderates, all RINOS. No MORE!!!!!! EVER!!!!! Palin all the way. And if you Romney-bots think this country would ever elect a MORMON, you are crazier than a loon! A two-bit Marxist Chicago Dem thug yes! A Mormon? NO way Jose!


38 posted on 02/15/2010 6:19:43 PM PST by Doc Savage (SOBAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Mitt Romney:"These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense," "They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people."

39 posted on 02/15/2010 6:22:29 PM PST by ansel12 ( (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

LOL, I’m voting for Palin in 2012 whether she’s on the ballot or not. GMAB.


40 posted on 02/15/2010 6:23:32 PM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson