What’s the discussion on the topic say about the removal of the material. Usually you can find something in there that is a “rationale” and then from that rationale, you can find a way to include material that you want in there...
Also, if you go to a series of mainline publicized original sources (and they can be published books by recognized authors, too)..., you can sometimes assemble a group of facts that can do the same thing that you’re trying to insert by just one article. Go back and use the source material that the author of that article used and then quote that source material, instead of the article you did quote.
These are just suggestions for a work-around and something that may work.
“These are just suggestions for a work-around and something that may work.”
I’ve done it, using the link in that post to the Harvard Crimson article and footnoted. It is irrefutable and he has acknowledged it. It gets pulled and there is never an explanation. It happened multiple times prior to the 04 campaign, of course, and I redid it every week or so, but finally lost interest after Kerry was defeated...insert it again occasionally, but from what I understand, Kerry has someone on his staff policing it...and remember, Tides Foundation and Soros are linked...Tides is Tah-Raisah’s baby...