Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Well that's because I wasn't aware that the great and all-knowing Galt thought that it was 'indisputable, documented, historical fact'. Had I known that well I would never have had the temerity to join in and point out where I thought Bigun was in error.

Error? When anyone suggests that "[t]he States created the Federal government and not the other way around," I would hardly call it an "error." But then, I'm not "Non-Sequitur."

After all, how can one argue with the genius who developed the political theory that the Constitution is analogous to the Publisher's Clearing House contest? I assume that your multi-volume study on that comparison is in the works?

LOL! Rules of admission are just that - rules of admission. Only an idiot (or "Non-Sequitur") would suggest that rules of admission necessarily imply similar rules and authority with regard to departure...

;>)

276 posted on 02/17/2010 5:35:34 AM PST by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: Who is John Galt?
LOL! Rules of admission are just that - rules of admission. Only an idiot (or "Non-Sequitur") would suggest that rules of admission necessarily imply similar rules and authority with regard to departure...

And I'm sure I speak for millions of others when I say I'm looking forward to your book explaining how the Constutition and a marketing campaign are almost identical. Can I get an autographed copy?

278 posted on 02/17/2010 5:55:46 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson