Skip to comments.
Rachel Maddow Alleges Black Candidate Supports Jim Crow Voting Laws
David Horowitz's NewsRealblog ^
| Liz Blaine
Posted on 02/14/2010 1:57:48 PM PST by Michael van der Galien
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: Michael van der Galien
"Ridicule, sneers and insults aimed at the right have become a trademark of MSNBCs commentators, but Rachel Maddow took them to new heights last week providing an opportunity to turn the tables."I thought the entire raison d'etre of MSNBC was to strive for new lows, not highs.
To: Michael van der Galien
I really have very little exposure to these people. But when I do happen to catch their act, it just amazes me that these so-called “journalists” see it as their job to defend Democrats 100% of the time and to ceaselessly ridicule anyone who opposes Democrats. They will say anything, make up any lies, assert the most preposterous allegations. All in service to their god.
3
posted on
02/14/2010 2:03:04 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(I was born in America, but now I live in Declinistan.)
4
posted on
02/14/2010 2:04:24 PM PST
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Political Correctness Will Get Us All Killed)
To: Michael van der Galien
If ignorance kept people from voting Maddow wouldnt get a vote.
5
posted on
02/14/2010 2:05:17 PM PST
by
Venturer
To: Michael van der Galien
Rachel, if you’re going to rip off Dennis Miller’s schtick, you could have left the hairdo and kept the intelligent, witty commentary.
6
posted on
02/14/2010 2:06:23 PM PST
by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: Michael van der Galien
The right to vote is sacred.
The earlier rationale for limiting votes to property owners (tax payers) and persons who could read the candidates’ positions on issues resulted in disenfranchisement but the remedy that followed has caused chronic corruption.
Aware of the propaganda that attempts to secure votes by promising largesse to one group in return for taxing another - demonstrates the need to protect voters’ rights by education not brain washing.
7
posted on
02/14/2010 2:07:41 PM PST
by
sodpoodle
(Despair - Man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption.)
To: domenad
She’s a bull dyke with a PHD,,,what do you expect?
8
posted on
02/14/2010 2:07:57 PM PST
by
Concho
To: Michael van der Galien
Hmmm, she condemns literacy tests for voter then goes on to say that the word filibuster must be changed to attract voters interest because it's such a boring word.
That' just one of the problem with lib logic, they can't speak for more than a minute without contradicting themselves.
BTW Rachel, get a hair cut, and whats up with the eraser on top of that dudes head?
9
posted on
02/14/2010 2:22:12 PM PST
by
Las Vegas Ron
("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM where are you?)
To: Michael van der Galien
This stupid bitch has about all the historical perspective and political intelligence God gave a f**king a mothball. And this is as polite as I can be without getting tossed off here.
10
posted on
02/14/2010 2:22:54 PM PST
by
John-Irish
("Shame of him who thinks of it''.)
To: Concho
The really sad fact though is there are people who listen to this bile and believe it. If only the good Lord would open their eyes.
11
posted on
02/14/2010 2:24:49 PM PST
by
animal172
(Can a girl with a mole on her face be happy married to a gopher?)
To: Michael van der Galien
he’s the cutest little boy i ever did see.
12
posted on
02/14/2010 2:53:05 PM PST
by
lonster
To: John-Irish
is directed at Megan McCain, Mr. Maddow or both :)
13
posted on
02/14/2010 2:53:35 PM PST
by
TV Dinners
(Hope is not a Strategy)
To: ClearCase_guy
I kept hearing about MSNBC but never watched it. So I decided the night that Scott Brown was elected to the Senate I’d tune in to Keith Olbermann.
How the heck does this guy keep a job? I wouldn’t hire him to flip burgers?
14
posted on
02/14/2010 2:54:04 PM PST
by
RonF
To: Michael van der Galien
I’ve never understood why she is on TV.
15
posted on
02/14/2010 2:56:00 PM PST
by
FTJM
To: RonF
MSNBC is under the false assumption that they can be the liberal answer to Fox News. The problem is...every channel is a liberal channel outside of Fox...just a question of degree. And MSNBC now has become a laughingstock. Jon Stewart makes fun of them as often as Fox now, which shows you what a joke it is.
Rachel Maddow is simply a partisan idealogue who rants...Olbermann is just an idiot.
16
posted on
02/14/2010 2:56:14 PM PST
by
Neoavatara
(http://neoavatara.com/blog)
To: TV Dinners
Mr. Maddow. Ms. McCain is too dumb to even know what planet she’s on. Mr. Maddow at least knows that.
17
posted on
02/14/2010 3:25:49 PM PST
by
John-Irish
("Shame of him who thinks of it''.)
To: Michael van der Galien
18
posted on
02/14/2010 3:27:32 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: sodpoodle
The earlier rationale for limiting votes to property owners (tax payers) and persons who could read the candidates positions on issues resulted in disenfranchisement but the remedy that followed has caused chronic corruption.
We should have kept the right to vote limited to property owners. Letting the unproductive have a vote is a recipe for disaster, as we are continuously discovering these days.
The Founding Fathers, as well as many political philosophers going back to the ancient Greeks, believed that direct democracy, where everyone gets a vote on everything, was the absolute worst form of government, because it would be mob rule - biggest majority gets to abuse everyone else. By expanding the franchise to every yahoo out there, we have brought ourselves closer and closer to that kind of ridiculousness, where the worthless societal leeches who live off of the public treasury are becoming the majority, and are constantly voting to steal money from those who actually work. No society can survive under those conditions, let alone thrive.
19
posted on
02/14/2010 3:54:31 PM PST
by
fr_freak
To: Concho
Will you not however concede that she does indeed have a purdy mowf?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson