“There are some very good arguments, and I think the American people have not seen all of the evidence there.”
Medina is leaving herself open to 9/11 trutherism - at the very least, and probably worse. How can anyone begin to defend that?
My understanding is the evidence was settled as to 9/11...so why make it an open issue which Medina did by not accepting the evidence already determined and settled....instead she raised further questioning of 9/11 which put her immediately on the side of the truthers.
Then there’s her sliding around on immigration...drugs..and her speaking out against republicans..she is a libertarian running under the mask of being a Rebublican...which is deceptive...and the list can go on. She’s proving herself to be a fraud.