Thanks Jim for the courage to put this blog article together. :)=^..^=
1 posted on
02/12/2010 9:13:08 AM PST by
Biggirl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Biggirl
2 posted on
02/12/2010 9:16:13 AM PST by
pgkdan
(I miss Ronald Reagan!)
To: Biggirl; Carlucci; proud_yank; meyer; Horusra; Para-Ord.45; rdl6989; mmanager; FreedomPoster; ...
3 posted on
02/12/2010 9:17:41 AM PST by
steelyourfaith
(FReepers were opposed to Obama even before it was cool to be against Obama.)
To: Biggirl
4 posted on
02/12/2010 9:31:11 AM PST by
Codeflier
(Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama - 4 democrat presidents in a row and counting...)
To: Biggirl
What a great clip. Not so much surgery by the reporter as vivisection. He’s well informed, canny, prepared, persistent, and has a big picture that makes sense. Would that we had such reporters in the U.S. Next generation, perhaps, taken from the ranks of bloggers.
To: BFL
6 posted on
02/12/2010 9:32:58 AM PST by
Excellence
(Meet your new mother-in-law, the United States Government.)
To: Biggirl; PapaBear3625; Carry_Okie; Duke C.; Slyscribe; lakeprincess; bruinbirdman; Schnucki; ...
Very good,...but with the latest revelations I would like to see an update...with Andrew firing the questions...he nailed Watson ...
To: Biggirl
Some of these global warming hoaxers should be in the penetentiary.
8 posted on
02/12/2010 9:42:02 AM PST by
SkipW
To: Biggirl
The left “always” says...there is universal agreement...
Amongst whom? Oh, that's right, you are so much more intelligent than me...you have already gathered EVERY BIT of information and it is a done deal.
Bullsh*t!
10 posted on
02/12/2010 9:49:35 AM PST by
gathersnomoss
(General George Patton had it right.)
To: Biggirl
Wonder how long this BBC guy will last? I just heard Rush say that the BBC retirement fund has $5 Billion in “climate change” investments.
13 posted on
02/12/2010 9:54:16 AM PST by
PLMerite
(Ride to the sound of the Guns - I'll probably need help.)
To: Biggirl
If this is what I saw yesterday, it is great to see how the Host handles this. No screaming and name calling, but the point gets across very well.
14 posted on
02/12/2010 9:55:22 AM PST by
BallyBill
(WARNING:Taking me serious could cause stress related illness.)
To: Biggirl
15 posted on
02/12/2010 9:56:20 AM PST by
MEG33
(God Bless Our Military Men and Women)
To: Biggirl
16 posted on
02/12/2010 9:56:30 AM PST by
SunTzuWu
To: Biggirl
The reporter did okay, but with someone like Lord Moncton firing questions, this “scientist” could have been made to look like a complete buffoon.
17 posted on
02/12/2010 9:58:21 AM PST by
postoak
To: Biggirl
Environmentalism is the religion of the atheists that have no other god. They are as fanatic and unreasonable as any muslim.
19 posted on
02/12/2010 10:25:12 AM PST by
TexasRepublic
(Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
To: Biggirl
BBC’s Andrew Neil was surprisingly on top of the IPCC fraud issue and raised important rebuttal points to “its all good science” meme. Nevertheless Chief Scientist at the Department for the Environment, Professor Robert Watson evaded the truth a few times. He no doubt expected an interview from a fellow AWG believer given it is the BBC.
To: Biggirl
Terrific video of a very good interviewer who has been able to ask the type of questions that had the IPCC Chief unable to disagree with their own mistakes! Really an eyeopener.
21 posted on
02/12/2010 10:41:45 AM PST by
iopscusa
(El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
To: Biggirl
To: Biggirl
Good theater, but the BBC guy could have done better. Multiple times Mr. Global Warming said that he was no longer involved, or picking his nose, when the IPCC was reporting one falsehood after another. They were in a 6000 page report and hadn't the time to read the whole thing.
We neither did I have time to read it. But the silliest claims, including all the ones the BBC host cited, were reported in almost every English language newspaper in the world. Did Mr. Global Warming stop reading newspapers too? When he heard a new report about things that seemed strange to him, didn't he have the time to use Google to do a little checking into these weird reports? Anyone who claims this was science is no scientist.
ML/NJ
23 posted on
02/12/2010 10:55:55 AM PST by
ml/nj
To: Biggirl
So, that's what an actual journalist looks like? Too bad there aren't any in the MSM on this side of the pond.
25 posted on
02/12/2010 11:11:19 AM PST by
zeugma
(Proofread a page a day: http://www.pgdp.net/)
To: Biggirl; neverdem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
