[Sans-Culotte]

I heard her actual quote... she did NOT say that she blames the US government. She was trying to make a “no comment” statement, saying that she didn’t have all the evidence to even make a statement on the facts.

The media is REALLY twisting this around.

I'm sorry, but "no comment" will not cut it. "No Comment" means she would entertain the possibility that Charlie Sheen and Rosie O'Donnell may be right. The default answer should be that the U.S. had nothing to do with the 9-11 attacks, other than allowing terrorists easy entry into the country. Unless she has evidence to the contrary, it is foolish and insane to even entertain the notion that the U.S. was involved.

I was really seriously considering voting for Medina, but now she is looking like another Ron Paul moonbat. Even if she is strong on other issues, I could never vote for a moonbat.

[texmexis best]

“I was really seriously considering voting for Medina, but now she is looking like another Ron Paul moonbat.”

I became a bit curious about her a few weeks ago but when I found out within minutes that she was a Paulinista I backed off big time. It seems that my reaction to her was correct. Moonbat.