Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SnakeDoctor

Why would it necessarily have to be the Bush administration? You think the Clintons incapable of such duplicity? They of Fort Marcy Park and many Arkancides fame?

Not that I’m a Truther or a Bush fan- I’m very much neither- but it coulda been!


238 posted on 02/11/2010 5:31:18 PM PST by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub. III OK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: dcwusmc

I can’t speak to Medina’s opinion of whom in our government was involved in the attack — but most “truthers” believe the Bush Administration was complicit. As for the Clinton Administration, there is a strain of “truthers” that believe the Clintons were also involved.

Personally, I do not believe the Clintons would ever knowingly or intentionally be involved in a terrorist attack on this country ... and the notion that they were is just as crazy as the notion that Bush and Cheney were involved. I do not believe ANY administration was involved, or capable of being involved, in this attack. Clinton has many shortcomings (ideologically and personally) ... but there is a distinction between perjury/sexual infidelity, and involvement in the mass murder of 3,000 American citizens.

SnakeDoc


243 posted on 02/11/2010 5:39:51 PM PST by SnakeDoctor (When you've got them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson