I can’t speak to Medina’s opinion of whom in our government was involved in the attack — but most “truthers” believe the Bush Administration was complicit. As for the Clinton Administration, there is a strain of “truthers” that believe the Clintons were also involved.
Personally, I do not believe the Clintons would ever knowingly or intentionally be involved in a terrorist attack on this country ... and the notion that they were is just as crazy as the notion that Bush and Cheney were involved. I do not believe ANY administration was involved, or capable of being involved, in this attack. Clinton has many shortcomings (ideologically and personally) ... but there is a distinction between perjury/sexual infidelity, and involvement in the mass murder of 3,000 American citizens.
SnakeDoc
There IS a school of thought that the Bent One was complicit in the OKC bombing, though not necessarily personally. There is evidence, which I find credible, that the blast which did the damage came from HIGH explosives, not the low order ANFO explosive, and that some of Hussein’s Republican Guard intel types were present in OKC at the time. The TV reporter, Jayna Davis, really seemed to have done her homework. Others **or maybe the same ones** have suggested that it was a sting gone awry. I know a lot of folks seem to think .gov can hold no secrets for long, but that is obviously not the case, for the most part. And if you were facing the choice of shut up and let the blame fall as it did or going to prison for life if you developed a belated conscience, what do you think YOU’D do? Especially if you knew that the truth would stay locked up until after you were sure to be dead and gone???
However, what IS known is that there was an impenetrable barrier placed between the Feebs and the Christians In Action that prevented a LOT of intelligence sharing. One can’t help but wonder how benign the Clown’s motives were when he had that one done.