[MozarkDawg]

That wasn’t a question one has to prepare for, it’s common sense.

So is not believing "some interesting questions have been raised." I'd much rather she give the answer she did then she lies, says a quick "No, of course not" and we discover later that she does indeed harbor the idea that somehow the government of the United States was complicit in the 9/11 attack.

[SnakeDoctor]

>> I’d much rather she give the answer she did then she lies, says a quick “No, of course not” and we discover later that she does indeed harbor the idea that somehow the government of the United States was complicit in the 9/11 attack.

For the truth shall set us free. God bless Glenn Beck for exposing this lunatic before she took the Tea Party movement and Texas down with her.

SnakeDoc

[Republic of Texas]

"I'd much rather she give the answer she did then she lies, says a quick "No, of course not" and we discover later that she does indeed harbor the idea that somehow the government of the United States was complicit in the 9/11 attack."

I agree with that statement. But what I would appreciate more than all of those options is that she say it's crazy and mean it. But yes, if I had a choice, I'd always rather my Governor be truthful AND sane. We just don't seem to have that option in this race.