Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
The first and most important reason I oppose her is because she shares Ron Paul's pro-choice for states position on abortion.

That's a blatant misrepresentation of her position, and yet more parsing and squirreling of the language to wring a damnable statement from her (and no, I won't retrieve her original statement for you. Most people reading here have seen it posted, or heard it live when she said it).

You really do have a hidden agenda. Why don't you come right out and be honest about why you really oppose Sarah Palin?

And let me remind you that you haven't left the thread, and are not just "returning fire", as you said.

You're continuing a specious argument against Sarah Palin, when, as the national chairman of a political party you should recuse yourself from this discussion.

438 posted on 02/10/2010 10:25:54 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier
No, she, exactly like Ron Paul and John McCain, has clearly said that the abortion question is up to the states. There isn't any doubt about this. And she recently endorsed Rand Paul, Ron Paul's son, for the US Senate in KY. He too holds this same position, which pretends as if the Fourteenth Amendment does not exist. It is also one hundred and eighty degrees out of phase with the Reagan pro-life plank which has been in the GOP platform for the last twenty-five years. That plank recognizes the personhood of the child and their protection by the Fourteenth Amendment.
447 posted on 02/10/2010 10:35:03 PM PST by EternalVigilance (A vote for McCain is a vote for amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson