Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier

Our party is different than any other party. We make our political associations and candidate endorsements based on core principles, not on party labels or registration.

So, if the Republicans see fit to run decent personhood pro-life, constitutionalist, peace through strength, moral conservative, Reaganite candidates, we’ll support them. As we are in a number of federal, state, and local races, by the way.

If they won’t do that, they don’t get our support. It’s that simple and straightforward.


383 posted on 02/10/2010 9:28:03 PM PST by EternalVigilance (A vote for McCain is a vote for amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

George Wallace ran under you banner...and you carry it onward...

and this:

“So, if the Republicans see fit to run decent personhood pro-life, constitutionalist, peace through strength, moral conservative, Reaganite candidates, we’ll support them. As we are in a number of federal, state, and local races, by the way.”

Is a laugh when you are attacking Palin claiming she is PRO-amnesty..

Reagan gave amnesty to 2.5 million illegal imigrants...

Maybe you should stop dragging his corpse around with your agenda stapled to his forhead...

You’d piss on Reagan if he ran today...


400 posted on 02/10/2010 9:43:16 PM PST by Crim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
...if the Republicans see fit to run decent personhood pro-life, constitutionalist, peace through strength, moral conservative, Reaganite candidates, we’ll support them.

If that's so, then I can't for the life of me understand why you choose to oppose Sarah Palin, who is arguably the most Reaganesque political figure we've seen in a generation.

I've read everything you've said about Sarah's stance on illegal immigration on this thread, but in my view, none of it holds water.

She is on record as saying that she is against illegal immigration, and that she believes that we need to shut the border. You, and other anti-Palin posters on this thread have attempted to parse out of her statements a position that is clearly 180 degrees out of sync with what she's said in plain English.

I see it as a sort or reaching and twisting on your part to do this. Stepping back from the noise of the argument, it's plain to see that the anti-Palin crowd are as determined to dislike Palin, as the liberal left is, though they may have very different reasons for doing so.

From my perspective, most of these negative reactions to Sarah Palin are rooted in something other than who and what this woman is, and what she really stands for. Attacks on Sarah from the right and left appear irrational to me, and to millions of others. She's done absolutely nothing to garner such stern criticism and outright derision from any American.

It all smells of a hidden agenda to me. Given the nearly unprecedented positive response she's generated among right-conservative Americans, I suspect that it looks that way to most on our side of the aisle.

409 posted on 02/10/2010 9:52:28 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson