Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rogue yam

I don’t see the “legitimate response” being at issue, as no one is defending the terrorist at issue.

The only thing that is apparent is you dislike Jews for declining to accept what you view as a correct religion.

I don’t push my religion on you; as part of a civil society, I would simply like the same courtesy.


19 posted on 02/11/2010 12:13:09 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Jewbacca
I don’t see the “legitimate response” being at issue, as no one is defending the terrorist at issue.

The only thing that is apparent is you dislike Jews for declining to accept what you view as a correct religion.

I don’t push my religion on you; as part of a civil society, I would simply like the same courtesy.

Your baseless accusations say nothing about me and everything about you.

The article quoted the Israeli police as stating that the Christians need to change their behavior in order to avoid future attacks. This is clearly blaming the victim.

Your definition of "civil society" is one in which Christians are not allowed to practice their faith (e.g. not allowed to evangelize). Mine is one in which non-violent, law-abiding citizens are not targeted with violence for practicing their faith. Which of us is being truly civil?

22 posted on 02/11/2010 2:32:46 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson